Zanzibar Peace, Truth & Transparency Association

EDUCATION FOR PEACE .

from Ali Mussa Mwadini

Dear Sir / Madame,
 
Please help our organization to unite & work together. to promote & sustain a true culture of peace & peace operations and local conflict resolution in Zanzibar community. The Zanzibar Peace, Truth & Transparency Association is a non-profit Organization, non-political, non-religious, and non-military registered in Zanzibar Tanzania, with its headquarters in Zanzibar Town.

zanzibar
Photo of Association on International Day of Peace

Against a background of wars, conflicts, tension and insecurity within Zanzibar community, our Organization was founded to focus on True Culture of Peace, and Peace related issues, such as Human rights, Gender Inequality, Interfaith, Democracy, Good Governance and Rule of law within Zanzibar and the Tanzania at large.
 
Our Organization is triggered by the resurgence of political misunderstandings between ruling and opposition political parties in every multiparty election in Zanzibar since 1995, which ends up with conflicts and distorts social fabrics. Zanzibar Peace, Truth & Transparency Association, is committed to address those political misunderstandings accordingly in order to safeguard lives and properties of the Zanzibar community.  In this respect, we therefore need to bring together and live Peaceful and prosperous society, and to ensures equal rights and privileges to all Zanzibar citizen.

We aim to:

– build a peaceful Zanzibar Community, free from Violence, Conflict, Hatred and Fear

– To promote compassion and understanding, respecting the Differences, Gender Equality and tolerance and for others live together in Harmony

– To promote peace Community in the Villages, Districts, Regional and National, encourage and strengthened for a National Movement for a True Culture of Peace in Zanzibar

(Article continued in the right column)

Question for this article:

Can peace be guaranteed through nonviolent means?

(Article continued from the left column)

– To undertake Peace Training program within rural Community Leaders, Religious groups, Women Groups, Youth Groups & Youth Centers, Schools, Colleges & universities,  in order to reduce conflicts and create  sustainable future generations

– To empower community members with skills and knowledge to produce income generating activities in order to reduce poverty and increase peace

– To Change and Revive the norms and rules governing Zanzibar community, Religious Groups & Political Parties, at all levels in order to ensure that conflicts are dealt with constructively through institutional channels

– To seek cooperation with Peace Loving countries and institutions which indulge in promoting Peace Awareness, Conflicts Resolution, Peace Building, Negotiation and Reconciliation, Strong Dialogue and Forgiveness and promote the Culture of Peace as an urgent task that requires the committed engagement of all the people in Zanzibar & the World.

Our Organization is working in Unguja & Pemba Islands through community training,  group meetings, mobile cinema, Political meetings, Religious Groups and Women Groups. The large population in our two Islands have adopted a peaceful way of life to avoid Conflicts

It Is Never Too Late To Live Together As Humans Despite  our Political Parties & Religious Differences
 
To consolidate peace after war is a long-term process. To consolidate democracy is an even longer one.

LET US UNITE FOR THE WORLD PEACE.
LET PEACE PREVAIL ON EARTH

Ali Mussa Mwadini
Executive Secretary & Peace Activist
ZPTTA NGO Zanzibar
( Tel: +255 777 451257 )
(amwadini1950@yahoo.com)

Wilmington, Delaware, USA: Movement for a Culture of Peace hosts restorative practices forum

. . DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION . .

An article by Megan Pauly for Delaware Public Media

A community discussion Saturday hosted Wilmington’s Movement for a Culture of Peace focused on finding ways to deal with issues such as trauma that violent crime in the city is bringing into classrooms. Around 30 educators, activists and concerned community members participated in the event. Among them was Malik Muhammad, president of a restorative practices consulting group, Akoben, LLC. He says stressing connectedness and building positive relationships helps change behavior, not punishment.

Wilmington
Photo by Megan Pauly / Delaware Public Media

“The traditional approach to trauma has been one, individualized. So we’ve isolated those who’ve experienced trauma and attempted to deal with them on an individual basis,” Muhammad said. “That approach in and of itself isn’t necessarily a negative one, but we need to create environments of safety, connection, trust and bonding so that those who are facing trauma – whether it’s seen or unseen – are really feeling connected.”

Muhammad adds relying mostly on social workers and counselors to engage the students isn’t effective. He says teachers, administrators and even students themselves need to be involved.

In 2012, the state brought Muhammad’s organization in to hold four full-day workshops for around 145 education professionals. Since then, he’s worked with 16 of 19 Delaware school districts, tailoring workshops to their specific needs.

(article continued in right column)

Discussion question

Restorative justice, What does it look like in practice?

(article continued from left column)

Will Fuller, Principal at the Positive CHANGE Academy – the Red Clay School District’s alternative school – was initially skeptical of the broad “relationship building” concept, but has seen firsthand its positive effects.

“I thought hey, this is not going to work for our kids but what I noticed over the last two years is that the students really love the process. They’ve bought into the process, the culture has changed,” Fuller said. “The staff members have bought into the process; it hadn’t been overnight.”

Kelley Lumpkin, Success Interventionist at Baltz Elementary in Elsmere, says she’s also seen a positive shift in the school’s culture since these practices were implemented a few years ago.

But Lumpkin says she sees social media as a potential barrier to creating critical face-to-face connectedness.

“It’s not like the schoolyard where these arguments used to happen and they could see the effect, right there. And it might give them a cue to stop it,” Lumpkin said. “Now they’re doing it where they’re not even seeing the effect, they’re not seeing what happens to the child as they’re doing it and other kids tagging in. And then the come to school and the rumor mill has spread it to another 20 kids.”

Lumpkin says her approach to working with kids varies depending on the situation.

It could include a group discussion for 10-15 minutes, or an hour-long talk. For other school-wide issues, she’s even held them in the gym for the entire 5th grade.

Muhammad says his work in Delaware has largely been in New Castle and Kent counties. This year, he’s working with the Red Clay and Christiana school districts.

It’s Campaign Season for UN Secretary General…And It Is Pretty Radical

FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION

An article by Mark Leon Goldberg, UN Dispatch

The race to become the next UN Secretary General just got slightly more crowded yesterday [April 5] when Helen Clark, former New Zealand prime minister and the current head of the UN Development Program, tossed her hat in the ring. Clark is one of the higher profile of the eight declared candidates. She is the fourth woman in the field and the only non-European to enter the race so far.

secgen

What makes her entry into the race particularly interesting is this straightforward video of her announcing her candidacy. It is the latest manifestation of just how radically new this process is to select a UN secretary general.

For the first time ever there will be a public campaign in the race to become the next UN Secretary General.

In the 70 years of United Nations, each of the eight Secretaries General were selected behind closed doors. Those doing the selecting were the five permanent members of the Security Council: the USA, Russia, the UK, France and China. Those countries would select a man to represent the United Nations and then the General Assembly, which is made up of all UN member states, would rubber stamp the pick.

This time around is wholly different. First, to be considered for the job, each candidate must first be nominated by their country. The process for doing so is straightforward: the country sends the nominating letter to the President of the General Assembly, who posts the candidates’ nominating letters and resumes to this website.

Now, for the first time in 70 years the general public knows exactly who is in the running for UN Secretary General. This counts as radical: even that modest amount of transparency was never really in the cards before.

The declared candidates as of April 4 (minus Helen Clark) and the dates they entered the race.

Dr. Srgjan Kerim, 30 December 2015
Prof. Dr. sc. Vesna Pusic, 14 January 2016
Dr. Igor Luksic, 15 January 2016
Dr. Danilo Turk, 9 February 2016
Ms. Irina Bokova, 11 February 2016
Ms. Natalia German, 19 February 2016
Mr. Antonio Guterres, 29 Febuary 2016

Because the process is open, there is a degree of public campaigning that has never existed. Candidates will be forced to go on the record with their positions on various key global issues. Their performance as communicators, diplomats and politicians will be evaluated by the press, the public, and all UN member states.

(Article continued in right column)

(Click here for the original Spanish of this aricle.)

Question(s) related to this article:

Can the UN help move the world toward a culture of peace?

(Article continued from left column)

On April 12, 13, and 14 each candidate will submit to two hours of questioning from the General Assembly. The President of the General Assembly, Mogens Lykketoft of Denmark, is presiding over the affair. For two hours, each candidate will be put on the spot by member states. Not only will their answers be judged on the merits, but their effectiveness as communicators will be tested as well.

And because this has never been done before, no one really knows what kinds of questions will be asked. Will groups of countries, like the EU, band together to ask the same questions to each candidate? Will it result in high minded discussions of the future of the UN? Will individual countries use their moment at the mic to score petty domestic political points? The answer is that we have absolutely no clue. That’s what makes this moment so interesting for UN watchers–the theater is not only in the answers given, but the questions asked. Also, questions will not only come from member states, but also from the NGO community and civil society, which has been invited to participate in this vetting.

Then, later in the week, the Guardian is holding town-hall style debate in New York in which journalists and the public can pose questions to the candidates. (Questions from the public are being solicited here.) Later in the Spring, a similar event will take place in London.

The Security Council is expected to begin its deliberations in July. To be sure, as in year’s past the candidate must find favor (or at least not be vetoed) by each of the five permanent members. The Security’s Council’s selection is then passed along to the General Assembly for a final vote.

But unlike year’s past, each member of the General Assembly — and the public at large — will have had the opportunity to vet the candidates. The candidate will need to prove her or his worth well before the final selection this summer.

(Thank you to Janet Hudgins, the CPNN reporter for this article.)

USA: Prisoners in Multiple States Call for Strikes to Protest Forced Labor

…. HUMAN RIGHTS ….

An article by Alice Speri in The Intercept

Prison Inmates around the country have called for a series of strikes against forced labor, demanding reforms of parole systems and prison policies, as well as more humane living conditions, a reduced use of solitary confinement, and better health care.

prisoners
Graphic from the pamphlet for the National Prison Strike

Inmates at up to five Texas prisons pledged to refuse to leave their cells today. The strike’s organizers remain anonymous but have circulated fliers listing a series of grievances and demands, and a letter articulating the reasons for the strike. The Texas strikers’ demands range from the specific, such as a “good-time” credit toward sentence reduction and an end to $100 medical co-pays, to the systemic, namely a drastic downsizing of the state’s incarcerated population.

“Texas’s prisoners are the slaves of today, and that slavery affects our society economically, morally and politically,” reads the five-page letter announcing the strike. “Beginning on April 4, 2016, all inmates around Texas will stop all labor in order to get the attention from politicians and Texas’s community alike.”

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice, which oversees the state’s prisons, “is aware of the situation and is closely monitoring it,” spokesperson Robert Hurst wrote in a statement to The Intercept. He did not comment on the prisoners’ grievances and demands. Prisoner rights advocates said at least one prison — the French Robertson Unit in Abilene — was placed under lockdown today, but Hurst denied any prisons in Texas were on lockdown because of planned strikes.

The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution bans “involuntary servitude” in addition to slavery, “except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,” thus establishing the legal basis for what is today a $2 billion a year industry, according to the Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit research institute.

Most able-bodied prisoners at federal facilities are required to work, and at least 37 states permit contracting prisoners out to private companies, though those contracts account for only a small percentage of prison labor. “Ironically, those are the only prison labor programs where prisoners make more than a few cents an hour,” Judith Greene, a criminal justice policy analyst, told The Intercept.

Instead, a majority of prisoners work for the prisons themselves, making well below the minimum wage in some states, and as little as 17 cents per hour in privately run facilities. In Texas and a few other states, mostly in the South, prisoners are not paid at all, said Erica Gammill, director of the Prison Justice League, an organization that works with inmates in 109 Texas prisons.

“They get paid nothing, zero; it’s essentially forced labor,” she told The Intercept. “They rationalize not paying prison laborers by saying that money goes toward room and board, to offset the cost of incarcerating them.”

In Texas, prisoners have traditionally worked on farms, raising hogs and picking cotton, especially in East Texas, where many prisons occupy former plantations.

(Article continued in the right column)

(Article continued from the left column)

“If you’ve ever seen pictures of prisoners in Texas working in the fields, it looks like what it is,” Greene said. “It’s a plantation: The prisoners are all dressed in white, they got their backs bent over whatever crop they’re tending, the guards are on horseback with rifles.” In the facilities Greene visited, prisoners worked all day in the heat only to return to cells with no air conditioning. “The conditions are atrocious, and it’s about time the Texas prison administration had to take note.”

In 1963, in an effort to reduce the cost of running prisons, Texas began employing inmates to manufacture a wide array of products, including mattresses, shoes, soaps, detergents, and textiles, as well as the furniture used in many of the state’s official buildings. Because of labor laws restricting the sale of prisoner-made goods, Greene said, those products are usually sold to state and local government agencies.

Although they comprise nearly half the incarcerated population nationwide — about 870,000 as of 2014 — prison workers are not counted in official labor statistics; they get no disability compensation in case of injury, no social security benefits, and no overtime.

“They keep a high conviction rate at any cost,” reads the letter circulated by prisoners ahead of today’s strike, “all for the well-being of the multimillion-dollar Prison Industrial Complex.”

The Texas action is not an isolated one. Prisoners in nearby Alabama and Mississippi, and as far away as Oregon, have also been alerted to the Texas strike through an underground network of communication between prisons.

“Over the long term, we’ll probably see more work stoppages,” said Gammill. “In prison, you think it’d be difficult to spread information, but it actually spreads like wildfire.”

On April 1, a group of prisoners from Ohio, Alabama, Virginia, and Mississippi called for a “nationally coordinated prisoner work stoppage against prison slavery” to take place on September 9, the 45th anniversary of the Attica prison riot. “We will not only demand the end to prison slavery, we will end it ourselves by ceasing to be slaves,” that announcement reads. “They cannot run these facilities without us.”

Prison protests and strikes have seen a revival in recent years after a slowdown resulting from the increased use of solitary confinement to isolate politically active inmates. In 2010, thousands of inmates from at least six Georgia prisons, organizing through a network of contraband mobile phones, refused to leave their cells to work, demanding better living conditions and compensation for their labor. That action was followed by prison protests in Illinois, Virginia, North Carolina, and Washington. In 2013, California prisoners coordinated a hunger strike to protest the use of solitary confinement. On the first day of that protest, 30,000 prisoners across the state refused their meals.

Last year in Texas, nearly 3,000 detainees demanding better conditions seized and partially destroyed an immigration detention center.

In March, protests erupted at Holman Correctional Facility, a maximum security state prison in Alabama, where two riots broke out over four days. At least 100 prisoners gained control of part of the prison and stabbed a guard and the warden. Those protests were unplanned, but prisoners there had also been organizing coordinated actions that they say will go ahead as planned.

“We have to strain the economics of the criminal justice system, because if we don’t, we can’t force them to downsize,” an activist serving a life sentence at Holman told The Intercept. “Setting fires and stuff like that gets the attention of the media,” he said. “But I want us to organize something that’s not violent. If we refuse to offer free labor, it will force the institution to downsize.”

“Slavery has always been a legal institution,” he added. “And it never ended. It still exists today through the criminal justice system.”

There’s a Place in India Where Religions Coexist Beautifully and Gender Equality Is Unmatched

TOLERANCE & SOLIDARITY .

An article in the Huffington Post by Chandran Nair, Global Institute for Tomorrow (reprinted according to the principle of “fair use”)

Back in the summer of 2015, the heart of a Hindu man was transported across Kerala for a Christian patient in dire need of a new one. Funds were raised by a Muslim businessman to pay for the operation and performed by the state’s top heart surgeon: a Christian. The entire state became engrossed as the story unfolded. An Indian Navy helicopter and an ambulance — both dispatched by Kerala’s Chief Minister Oommen Chandy — sped the heart from Thiruvananthapuram to Kochi.

Kerala
Photo by Frank Bienewald via Getty Images

Kerala is known by the motto “God’s Own Country.” Some may think the moniker is presumptive, but anyone who has seen its forests, its backwaters, its beaches and its bounty of agricultural produce and spices will know it is well deserved.

Over centuries, people from many different communities and cultures traveled through and lived in Kerala — Jewish and Christian migrants, Arab merchants, European traders and colonizers. The city of Kochi has India’s oldest active synagogue and the oldest European church, both from the sixteenth century.

But perhaps “God’s Own Country” deserves a new and highly relevant interpretation. Kerala is a symbol of religious coexistence — not simply tolerance — in a world that is struggling with new strains of virulent intolerance and violence. The state has a unique mix of three of the world’s largest religions: roughly 30 percent Muslims, 20 percent Christians and 50 percent Hindus. This split is unique in India — not many other places have such significant populations of both Christians and Muslims living with a not too large majority of Hindus — and perhaps unique even globally.

Given this mix, the rarity of communal violence is striking; a few small-scale incidents are exceptions to a norm of stability and coexistence. The various religions have evolved to integrate and include their neighboring faiths; for example, the Hindu Edappara Maladevar Nada Temple has a shrine dedicated to Kayamkulam Kochunni, a popular nineteenth-century Muslim “Robin Hood.” Keralites believe themselves to be, first and foremost, Indian Malayalis.

Some may say this tolerance is no surprise, given the long histories of both Christians and Muslims in Kerala. But one need only look at Eastern Europe or the Middle East, where long-standing bonds within a once diverse community were ruptured within a single generation.

So what might explain this peaceful and secular coexistence? There are many possible reasons but one striking thing about Kerala that may offer an explanation is its near-universal provision of not just basic needs, but also public and social services. Kerala’s literacy rate — 94 percent — is in the same range as much richer areas like the Gulf, China and Europe. The state’s infant mortality rate is 12 per 1,000 births, compared to 40 per 1,000 births for India as a whole. Kerala’s toilet coverage is almost universal — 97 percent. Earlier this year, Kerala became the first state in India to achieve 100 percent primary education.

(Article continued in right column)

Question related to this article:

 

How can different faiths work together for understanding and harmony?

(Article continued from left column)

It should also be noted that Kerala has a level of gender parity unmatched by any other state in India and, in fact, many places around the world. Kerala is one of only two Indian states where women outnumber men; all other Indian states have more men — sometimes significantly so. While India as a whole has significantly lower female literacy than male literacy, Kerala’s rates are roughly equal. Kerala also boasts the largest women-empowering network in the country: the Kudumbashree Mission, which boasts over four million members.

By global standards, Kerala is by no means rich: it has an average income of about $1,300. However, in many important social indicators, it outperforms not just other Indian states, but several other countries with higher per capita incomes — like Malaysia, with an average income of about $11,000, and the UAE, with an average income of about $44,000.

Kerala’s government has very effectively made the provision of social services one of the central pillars of policy and thus development towards social cohesion. Chief Minister Chandy noted three reasons for his state’s success: education, health and infrastructure. In all of these areas, the government has actively strived to improve services to a global standard, even though he acknowledged that infrastructure in areas such as transportation still had much room for improvement.

When the basic needs of life — food, water, sanitation, housing, education, healthcare — are denied, resentment against the “other” can fester. Racial, ethnic and religious divisions can be exploited and can erupt into communal violence — in both the developing and developed worlds. Whether it is Myanmar, the Dominican Republic, Paris or Baltimore or elsewhere, resentment between groups is driven, in part, by a feeling that of being denied access to basic economic and social rights. Part of the backlash against immigrants and “foreign” groups is a misdirected “solution” to a real problem: stagnating incomes and lessening job opportunities for the working classes.

But when social needs are provided on a universal basis, there is less cause for grievances that can be nurtured or exploited. No group feels like they are being left behind. The burden is shared and the work of reducing the drudgery of daily life to uplift people becomes a collective responsibility. There is clear evidence that this focus on needs, and its community-based approach often led by volunteers, is part of what makes Kerala a success.

This is not to say that Kerala is perfect — it still has a long way to go before it really sees high development measured according to global standards. But it may be a model of how to keep multiethnic and multi-religious communities stable in the long-term.

Rather than platitudes about multiculturalism or a hope that rising incomes will make everyone forget their cultural roots, an aggressive and universal expansion of social services may instead be the answer to communal tensions. It could make all of India — not just Kerala — “God’s Own Country.”

USA: University of Wisconsin receives UN chair for global work on gender, well-being and peace

. . WOMEN’S EQUALITY . .

An article by Ann Grauvogl, University of Wisconsin – Madison News

The University of Wisconsin—Madison has been awarded a UNESCO Chair on Gender, Well-being and a Culture of Peace, a first in the state of Wisconsin and a first for the university in any area. It creates a global platform for the Department of Gender and Women’s Studies and for the campuswide 4W (Women and Well-being in Wisconsin and the World) Initiative.

wisconsin
Araceli Alonso in Kenya, 2009. PHOTO COURTESY OF COLLEGE OF LETTERS & SCIENCE

“This recognition by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) affirms UW–Madison’s strength in addressing global issues,” says Chancellor Rebecca Blank. “The interdisciplinary ethic of our faculty, staff and students allows us to engage on complex issues from a host of perspectives. That’s a valuable asset to the UNESCO network around the world.”

UNESCO has designated more than 670 chairs worldwide to promote international cooperation and networking among universities. UW–Madison joins a network of 12 other chairs on gender around the world, connecting efforts of women in Europe, Latin America, Africa and the United States.

“The establishment of this chair is a testimony to the role that UW–Madison has played, locally and globally, to advance women in a broad array of fields, including human ecology, gender and women’s studies, nursing and education,” says Lori DiPrete Brown, director of the 4W Initiative and an associate director of the Global Health Institute (GHI). “The robust range of activities of 4W leaders from throughout campus was an important factor in determining the award.”

The Chair Selection Committee recognized UW–Madison’s plans to encourage innovation through technological databases, online portals, North-South collaboration and information sharing.

“The chair will be the first in North America to interrelate gender, well-being and culture of peace through researchers, practitioners and advocates for knowledge exchange and collaboration,” according to a statement from the committee.

(Article continued in right column)

Question related to this article:

Does the UN advance equality for women?

(Article continued from left column)

The chair will be housed in the Department of Gender and Women’s Studies and is created in partnership with the Foundation for a Culture of Peace in Madrid, Spain. The activities of the chair will be integrated with the 4W Initiative and will include an annual summit, a broad range of field activities, and publications related to gender, well-being and a culture of peace.
Araceli Alonso, a senior lecturer in gender and women’s studies and 4W director for Gender, Clinical Practice and the Health Sciences, and Teresa Langle de Paz, co-director of Women’s Knowledge International at the Foundation for a Culture of Peace, will jointly hold the chair.

Alonso also founded the Health by Motorbike Project in Kenya and co-leads 4W’s project to end sex trafficking and exploitation. She has collaborated with other UNESCO chairs on gender and development and welcomes the chance for further collaboration locally, regionally, nationally and globally.

Langle de Paz is also an honorary fellow for the Women’s Research Center at the Gender and Women’s Studies Department.

“The UNESCO chair can take our work at UW–Madison a step further into a global arena fostering transnational cooperation between feminist scholars, gender issues professionals, institutions, networks, policy makers and organizations,” Alonso says. “We expect to create a global learning community and a platform of leaders committed to gender equality and equity, human flourishing and well-being, and a culture of peace that respects all human rights and promotes sustainable development, thinking not only on present generations but also in future ones.”

Karl Scholz, dean of the College of Letters & Science, is thrilled to house the chair in Gender and Women’s Studies.
“This will enhance our efforts to improve the health, education and well-being of women all over the world,” Scholz says. “With this recognition, we will be able to engage more students and scholars from across campus, which truly epitomizes the Wisconsin Idea.”

The designation gives UW–Madison a voice on these issues at an international level, says Soyeon Shim, dean of the School of Human Ecology (SoHE) and 4W lead dean.

“The UNESCO Chair gives the university the credibility and prestige on gender, well-being and a culture of peace, a topic that’s also important to the United Nations,” Shim says.

The chair provides both the opportunity and responsibility for UW–Madison faculty, staff and students to continue their work on issues of gender and well-being. Through research, service, leadership and collaboration with partners from around the world, they are improving access to health care in Kenya and Ethiopia, empowering women farmers in Ghana, collaborating with artisans in Mexico and Ecuador, and working to stop sex trafficking both locally and globally.

“We’re not just dreaming this thing, we’re doing it already,” Shim says.

Nonviolent Peaceforce: A paradigm shift?

EDUCATION FOR PEACE .

An article from the Nonviolent Peaceforce

As violent chaos overwhelms all existing approaches to civilian protection, unarmed civilian protection is gaining attention. Over the past three months, NP has given high-level presentations in Europe, the Middle East and the US.

paradigm

On February 1, Rolf Carriere, NP board member and senior advisor, spoke at a Brussels forum on Civil Society Perspectives on European Union Implementation of the 2015 UN Reviews. In noting that unarmed civilian protection (UCP) was prominently cited in two UN reviews, Mr. Carriere asserted, “UCP is ready for scaling up. There is almost no conflict where it would not be suitable for these unarmed strategies to be used, especially if the engagement is early on in the conflict cycle, more preventative.”

NP board chair Mukesh Kapila and Tiffany Easthom, NP director for the Middle East, spoke on a panel at the World Bank’s Fragility Forum in Washington DC., March 1-3, where they noted that the sum of the various efforts by international actors is clearly not adequate to today’s needs of rising toll of humanitarian disasters and violence against civilians. They stressed the need to be guided by the local communities, to utilize unarmed approaches and to challenge institutional norms.

Two weeks later, Dr. Rachel Julian of Leeds Beckett University in the UK joined Easthom in Berlin to testify before a subcommittee of the Bundestag. Based on evaluations, case studies and interviews of those involved with nine organizations providing unarmed civilian protection, Dr. Julian has found that UCP changes the behavior of armed actors, helps communities stay at home and saves lives. Ms. Easthom was impressed by the parliamentarians’ high level of knowledge and keen interest to scale up UCP. Mel Duncan followed up with a delegation of German parliamentarians when the visited New York in early April.

(Article continued in the right column)

Question for this article:

Can peace be guaranteed through nonviolent means?

(Article continued from the left column)

Chris Holt and Shannon Radsky of NP’s team in South Sudan spent a week in mid-March speaking at parallel events for the UN’s Commission on the Status of Women as well as meeting with UN officials in New York. While affirming the findings of the March 10th UN High Commissioner on Human Rights Report of extreme violence in South Sudan, they went on to detail ways that women are not only victims but also effective agents of civilian protection.

On the religious front, Easthom participated in a retreat sponsored by the World Council of Churches in Beirut where they adopted a strong theme of nonviolent approaches. And Mel will take part in a conference on nonviolence at the Vatican in mid April.

So what does this all mean? Merely a dizzying array of junkets? Or will this advocacy translate into a meaningful increase in the protection of civilians? Dr. Julian observes that a paradigm shift is underway, “One of the most dramatic shifts will have taken place when everyone realizes that, the assumption that an armed actor will not yield to anything except a weapon has been proven to be untrue.”

Together we are proving that point from the bush of South Sudan and bringing the messages to places like Bundestag of Germany.

(Thank you to Janet Hudgins, the CPNN reporter for this article.)

Landmark Vatican conference rejects just war theory, asks for encyclical on nonviolence

TOLERANCE AND SOLIDARITY .

An article by Joshua J. McElwee for the National Catholic Reporter

The participants of a first-of-its-kind Vatican conference have bluntly rejected the Catholic church’s long-held teachings on just war theory, saying they have too often been used to justify violent conflicts and the global church must reconsider Jesus’ teachings on nonviolence.
Members of a three-day event co-hosted by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and the international Catholic peace organization Pax Christi have also strongly called on Pope Francis to consider writing an encyclical letter, or some other “major teaching document,” reorienting the church’s teachings on violence.

vatican

There is no ‘just war,'” the some 80 participants of the conference state in an appeal they released Thursday morning.

“Too often the ‘just war theory’ has been used to endorse rather than prevent or limit war,” they continue. “Suggesting that a ‘just war’ is possible also undermines the moral imperative to develop tools and capacities for nonviolent transformation of conflict.”

“We need a new framework that is consistent with Gospel nonviolence,” say the participants, noting that Francis and his four predecessors have all spoken out against war often. “We propose that the Catholic Church develop and consider shifting to a Just Peace approach based on Gospel nonviolence.”

NCR’s sister publication Celebration offers a FREE resource guide on Pope Francis’ The Face of Mercy. Get it here.
FaceofMercy_coverSMALL.jpg
Just war theory is a tradition that uses a series of criteria to evaluate whether use of violence can be considered morally justifiable. First referred to by fourth-century bishop St. Augustine of Hippo, it was later articulated in depth by 13th-century theologian St. Thomas Aquinas and is today outlined by four conditions in the formal Catechism of the Catholic Church.

The Rome conference, held Monday through Wednesday [April 10-13], brought experts engaged in global nonviolent struggles to reconsider the theory for the first time under the aegis of the Vatican.

It comes after a number of theologians have criticized continued use of the theory in modern times, saying that both the powerful capabilities of modern weapons and evidence of the effectiveness of nonviolent campaigns make it outdated.

At a press event launching the conference’s final appeal document — given the title “An Appeal to the Catholic Church to Re-Commit to the Centrality of Gospel Nonviolence” — several of the event’s participants said the church should simply no longer teach the just war theory.

“I came a long distance for this conference, with a very clear mind that violence is outlived,” said Archbishop John Baptist Odama of Gulu, Uganda. “It is out of date for our world of today.”

“We have to sound this with a strong voice,” said the archbishop. “Any war is a destruction. There is no justice in destruction. … It is outdated.”

The Catechism currently outlines as one criteria for moral justification of war that “the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated” and notes that “the power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.”

Odama, who also leads Uganda’s bishops’ conference, said the conditions in the Catechism “are only given to say in reality there should be no war.”

“This is where the group was very strong,” he said, referring to the conference. “We should not give now, at this moment, reasons for war. Let us block them and promote relationships of harmony, of brother and sisterhood, rather than going for war.”

Marie Dennis, an American who serves as a co-president of Pax Christi International, said she and the conference group “believe that it is time for the church to speak another word into the global reality.”

(article continued on the right side of the page)

Question for this article

Where in the world can we find good leadership today?

Readers’ comments are invited on this question and article. See below for comments box.

(article continued from the left side of the page)

“When we look at the reality of war, when we look at the teachings of Jesus, we’re asking what is the responsibility of the church,” she said. “And it is, we believe, a responsibility to promote nonviolence.”

Dennis also said she understands that people may raise concerns in rejecting the just war theory over needing to stop unjust aggressors. Her group, she said, agrees that violent aggressors have to be stopped.

“The question is how,” said Dennis. “Our belief would be that as long as we keep saying we can do it with military force, we will not invest the creative energy, the deep thinking, the financial and human resources in creating or identifying the alternatives that actually could make a difference.”

“As long as we say that dropping bombs will solve the problem we won’t find other solutions and I think that’s feeling more and more clear to us,” he said.

The April conference on just war theory had been discussed for months and was the first cohosted by the Vatican’s pontifical council and Pax Christi, an international Catholic coalition akin to Amnesty International that maintains separate national groups in many countries.

The conference was organized around four sessions allowing participants to dialogue and share experiences with one another. The only scheduled talk at the event was given by Cardinal Peter Turkson, the head of the pontifical council, who also read a letter sent to the participants by Francis.

Among other participants were bishops from Nigeria and Japan, and leaders of the Rome-based umbrella groups for men and women religious around the world. Also taking part were a senior policy fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace, several noted theologians, and Irish Nobel Peace Prize winner Mairead Maguire.

The group’s final appeal states succinctly: “The time has come for our Church to be a living witness and to invest far greater human and financial resources in promoting a spirituality and practice of active nonviolence.”

“In all of this, Jesus is our inspiration and model,” they state. “Neither passive nor weak, Jesus’ nonviolence was the power of love in action.”

Odama said Jesus “always asked his followers not to resort to violence in solving problems, including in his last stage of life.”

“On the cross, [Jesus] said, ‘Father forgive them because they don’t know what they’re doing,'” said the archbishop. “In this statement, he united the whole of humanity under one father.”

“He does not take violent words and violent actions,” said Odama. “That is the greatest act of teaching as to how we should handle our situations. Not violence.”

Dennis said that part of the goal in organizing the conference “was to ultimately lead to an encyclical or a process that would produce major Catholic teaching on nonviolence.”

“We haven’t run into a roadblock yet,” she said. “There are no promises.”

“What we really hope will happen is a process that will engage the Vatican and the Catholic communities around the world in exactly these questions,” said Dennis. “What can we know better about the role that nonviolence can play in shifting our world to a better place?”

Ken Butigan, a lecturer at DePaul University in Chicago and executive director of the non-profit group Pace e Bene, said: “We have gotten a green light for months that this is something that Pope Francis is excited about moving forward on.”

“We are determined to support that momentum at this historical moment,” he said. “We know Pope Francis has a vision and we’re here to support that vision.”

(Thank you to Janet Hudgins, the CPNN reporter for this article.)

Bulletin français 1 avril 2016

. . VILLES CULTURE DE PAIX . .

Il apparaît que la culture de la paix progresse de plus en plus à travers les villes selon les articles que nous avons publiés dans CPNN depuis janvier.

Au plus haut niveau, les maires de Madrid, Manuela Carmena, et de Paris, Anne Hidalgo, vont organiser un forum international contre la violence et pour l’éducation à la paix. Avec Bruxelles, ce sont leurs villes qui ont souffert le plus des attaques terroristes en Europe. Face aux États-nations qui ne donnent que des réponses militaires, ces municipalités proposent l’éducation pour la non-violence.

Alors que les États-nations continuent à fabriquer des armes nucléaires, le réseau, Maires pour la Paix, avec plus de 6.900 villes dans 161 pays, continue à donner la priorité à la lutte pour le désarmement nucléaire. Nous avons récemment publié un article d’une de leurs villes membres, Wellington, Nouvelle-Zélande.

D’autre part, le réseau,Villes internationales de paix, avec 130 villes membres dans 40 pays, a récemment annoncé une alliance avec le réseau nouvellement formé de Villes de Compassion comprennant 70 villes dans près de 50 pays qui ont affirmé la Charte pour la Compassion, promouvant la culture de la paix au niveau local.

Aux États-Unis est né un mouvement croissant de villes qui entreprennent la transformation vers une culture de la paix.

A New Haven, au Connecticut, pour la quatrième année la Commission pour la paix, un organe du gouvernement de la ville, a publié un rapport sur l’état de la culture de la paix. Le rapport identifie les priorités pour l’action de la ville. Deux de leurs priorités ont été présentées dans les articles récents de CPNN: la justice réparatrice dans les écoles, et l’accueil des réfugiés.

La ville de Ashland, en Oregon, a récemment établi une Commission Culture de la Paix dont l’un de leurs travaux est la rédaction d’un rapport annuel sur l’état de la culture de la paix dans leur ville. D’autres tâches incluent la formation des ambassadeurs de la paix, l’éducation à la paix dans les écoles, un répertoire des ressources communautaires qui favorisent une culture de la paix, et un monument contenant la Flamme de la paix mondiale.

Des organisations de la société civile à Wilmington, au Delaware, développent une “vision stratégique, un plan et un document des ressources qui apportera la paix à Wilmington. Le plan traitera des actions nécessaires pour transformer une culture de violence en une culture de la paix. Le plan comprendra l’apport des groupes civiques, la ville, l’État, les églises, les étudiants, les personnes âgées, et le grand public “.

Une nouvelle initiative a pour but de créer un réseau des “villes non-violentes,” sur le modèle d’une initiative à Carbondale, en Illinois. Ses objectifs sont similaires à ceux de New Haven, Ashland et Wilmington: “Villes non-violentes travaillera à mettre fin au racisme, à la pauvreté, au vagabondage, à la violence sous toutes ses formes et à tous les niveaux, à démanteler la ségrégation du logement et à poursuivre l’intégration raciale, sociale et économique.

Il s’agit aussi de “mettre fin aux violences policières en institutionnalisant la nonviolence au sein de la police, d’organiser en enseignement qui stoppe la violence domestique et developpe la nonviolence envers tous les enfants, de travailler pour mettre fin à la violence des bandes et enseigner la nonviolence à leurs membres.”

Toujours dans cette initiative, elle veut “enseigner la nonviolence dans toutes les écoles; poursuivre la nonviolence dans les programmes et les politiques d’immigration; amener les dirigeants et les communautés religieuses à promouvoir la nonviolence et la vision d’une ville nouvelle, nonviolente; réformer les prisons afin qu’elles soient moins violentes en éduquant les gardiens et les prisonniers dans la nonviolence.”

Enfin, l’initiative propose de “passer de la justice rétributive à la justice réparatrice dans l’ensemble du système de justice pénale; d’arrêter la destruction locale de l’environnement, de stopper le changement climatique, et le racisme environnemental; de poursuivre le progrès énergetique concernant l’eau propre, les énergies éolienne et solaire, avec une communauté verte à 100 pour cent, et en général, faire tout ce qui est possible pour aider la communauté locale à devenir plus solidaire, plus juste, plus accueillante, et, donc, d’avantage nonviolente.”

Les pratiques avancées par la culture des villes de paix comprennent la médiation, la justice réparatrice et la budgétisation participative, comme décrit dans les articles de CPNN précédents.

      

PARTICIPATION DÉMOCRATIQUE

Ashland

USA: Working on creating a culture of peace in Ashland

ÉQUALITÉ HOMMES/FEMMES

csw unionists

Les délégations syndicales commencent leur travail lors de la 60e Session de la Commission de la condition de la femme des Nations Unies

DISARMAMENT ET SECURITÉ

trident

United Kingdom: Thousands call for Britain’s nuclear deterrent Trident to be scrapped

DROITS DE L’HOMME

amnesty

2015: When Global Governments Trampled Human Rights in Name of National Security

TOLERANCE ET SOLIDARITÉ

rising

GLOBAL YOUTH RISING: Empowering passionate activists and peace workers from around the world– JULY 2016

DÉVELOPPEMENT DURABLE

einstein
Les Lauréats Sénégalais du “Next Einstein Forum” exposent les résultats de leurs travaux scientifiques

LIBERTÉ DE L’INFORMATION

guantanomo

Guantanamo could be turned from a war facility to a peace park

ÉDUCATION POUR LA PAIX

patrir
Romania: Systemic Peacebuilding, Conflict Transformation & Post-War Recovery and Reconciliation

Boletín español: el 01 de abril 2016

. CIUDADES DE CULTURA DE PAZ .

La cultura de paz se promueve cada vez más a nivel municipal de acuerdo a los artículos que hemos publicado este año en CPNN.

Al más alto nivel, la alcaldesa de Madrid, Manuela Carmena, y la alcaldesa de París, Anne Hidalgo, están planeando un foro internacional contra la violencia y para la educación para la paz. Junto con Bruselas, esas ciudades han sufrido los más terribles ataques terroristas en Europa. Mientras los estados nacionales buscan respuestas militares, las alcaldesas proponen la educación para la no violencia.

Mientras que los estados nacionales siguen fabricando armas nucleares, la red de Alcaldes por la Paz, con más de 6.900 ciudades en 161 países, sigue dando prioridad a la lucha por el desarme nuclear. Recientemente hemos publicado un artículo de una de sus ciudades miembros, Wellington, Nueva Zelanda.

La red de Ciudades Internacionales de Paz, con 130 ciudades miembros en 40 países, ha anunciado recientemente una alianza con la nueva red de Ciudades Compasivos que incluye 70 ciudades en casi 50 países que han afirmado la Carta por la Compasión, que promueve una cultura de paz al nivel local.

En los Estados Unidos hay un movimiento creciente de ciudades que llevan a cabo la transformación hacia una cultura de paz.

En New Haven, Connecticut, por cuarto año la Comisión de Paz, un órgano gubernamental de la ciudad, emitió un informe sobre la situación de la cultura de paz. El informe identifica las prioridades para la acción en la ciudad. Dos de sus prioridades aparecieron en los últimos artículos de CPNN: la justicia restaurativa en las escuelas, y la acogida de los refugiados.

La ciudad de Ashland, Oregon, estableció recientemente una Comisión de Cultura de Paz, y entre sus tareas está también un informe anual sobre la situación la cultura de paz en su ciudad. Otras tareas incluyen la capacitación de los embajadores de la paz, educación para la paz en las escuelas, un directorio de recursos comunitarios que promueven una cultura de paz, y un monumento con la Llama de la Paz Mundial.

Las organizaciones de la sociedad civil en Wilmington, Delaware, están desarrollando una “visión estratégica, un plan y un documento de los recursos que traerá la paz a Wilmington. El plan se ocupará de las acciones necesarias para transformar la cultura de violencia en cultura de paz. El plan incluirá el aporte de grupos cívicos, gobiernos de la ciudad y del estado, las iglesias, estudiantes, ancianos, y el público en general”.
Una nueva iniciativa tiene como objetivo crear una red de ciudades “no violentas”, basado en el modelo de una iniciativa en Carbondale, Illinois. Sus objetivos son similares a los de New Haven, Ashland y Wilmington: “Las ciudades sin violencia trabajarían para acabar con el racismo, la pobreza, la falta de vivienda, y la violencia en todos los niveles y en todas sus formas; desmantelar la segregación de viviendas y llevar a cabo la integración racial, social y económica; poner fin a la violencia policial; organizarse para poner fin a la violencia doméstica y enseñar la no violencia entre los cónyuges, y la no violencia hacia todos los niños, el trabajo para poner fin a la violencia de pandilla y enseñar la no violencia a sus miembros; enseñar la no violencia en todas las escuelas; ejecutar programas y políticas de inmigración menos violentas; asegurar que los líderes religiosos y comunitarios promuevan la visión de una ciudad no violenta; reformar las cárceles y prisiones locales para que sean menos violentos y educar a los guardias y detenidos en la no violencia; pasar de la justicia retributiva a la justicia restaurativa en todo el sistema de justicia penal; afrontar la destrucción del medio ambiente, el cambio climático, y el racismo ambiental, perseguir agua limpia, energía solar y eólica, y una comunidad un 100 por ciento verde; y, en general, hacer todo lo posible para ayudar a su comunidad local ser más desarmada, más reconciliada, más justa, más acogedora, más inclusiva y más no violenta “.

Entre las prácticas promovidas por las ciudades de cultura de paz están la mediación, la justicia restaurativa y los presupuestos participativos, tal como se publicó en los artículos anteriores de CPNN.

      

PARTICIPACIÓN DEMOCRATICA

Mexico
La Ciudad de México: Aplicarán sistema de mediación en las 16 delegaciones

IGUALDAD HOMBRES/MUJERES

csw unionists

Education International and other Global Union Federation delegations begin their work at the 60th Session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

DESARME Y SEGURIDAD

trident

United Kingdom: Thousands call for Britain’s nuclear deterrent Trident to be scrapped

DERECHOS HUMANOS

amnesty

2015: When Global Governments Trampled Human Rights in Name of National Security

TOLERANCIA Y SOLIDARIDAD

rising

GLOBAL YOUTH RISING: Empowering passionate activists and peace workers from around the world– JULY 2016

DESAROLLO SUSTENTABLE

Fishing

Fishing ban in remote Pacific waters is working, report finds

LIBERTAD DE INFORMACIÓN

guantanomo

Guantanamo could be turned from a war facility to a peace park

EDUCACIÓN PARA PAZ

patrir
Romania: Systemic Peacebuilding, Conflict Transformation & Post-War Recovery and Reconciliation