UN SDG’s: The ‘Meta-Goal,’ Bringing 193 Nations Together

. . SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT . .

An article in the Huffington Post by Achim Steiner, UNEP Executive Director and Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations

Having two parties agree on a common goal can be a challenge. Having 193 parties agree to 17 of them is, to understate it, uncommon. So when the Sustainable Development Goals are adopted this week by 193 UN Member States, it’s fair to say we will be witnessing something historic.

steiner

Having all nations concur on a path forward for the entire planet and its peoples is unprecedented, and indeed, an accomplishment in and of itself.

But despite the enormity of the task, setting the goals was the easy part. Achieving them is where the hard work begins in earnest. With 17 goals that integrate all aspects of our economies, societies and the environment, the challenge is formidable. That these goals apply to all nations — developed and developing — means that the challenge is a universal one.

The cross-cutting, global nature of the goals necessitates a degree of cooperation as unprecedented as the goals themselves.

Nations of the world recognized this fact as the goals were being developed. To help enable the coordination needed to achieve them, member states included what might be called a meta-goal: SDG 17. The intent of Goal 17 is to advance the notion of partnerships, from local to global, that will be fundamental to achieving the other 16 SDGs.

We have seen the power of partnerships and cooperation in the 193-nation consensus on a sustainable future. That power must now be harnessed to take us there.

Having all countries of the world on board is only the beginning. Sustainable development will need participation and cooperation between governments, the private sector and civil society.

Why is this so? Aside from the fact that the SDGs are shared goals for all humanity, it comes down to an unyielding reality: no single institution possesses the resources and competencies needed to achieve these goals alone.

Investment on a massive scale will be required in sectors such as energy, infrastructure, transport and information technology to support sustainable-development objectives.

Technology, policy coherence and governance will also need to be aligned with the goals of sustainable development.

(Article continued in right column.)

Question for this article:

Despite the vested interests of companies and governments, Can we make progress toward sustainable development?

(Article continued from the left column)

When it comes to financing, according to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, some $5-7 trillion will be needed annually to achieve the SDGs.

Public finance can only contribute so much.

Consider the investments required to adapt to climate change over the coming decades. Climate resilience will be a critical component of sustainable development. According to UNEP’s first Adaptation Gap Report, the global investment required for adaptation to climate change is likely to hit $300 billion per year until 2050 — possibly rising as high as $500 billion.

In 2013, the total amount of public climate finance was $137 billion.

Making up the difference seems like a daunting task.

This is where potential of global partnerships comes into play. In 2013, private climate financing totaled $193 billion.

This is still short of what is needed for climate finance, let alone the trillions more required to support sustainability across all sectors over the coming decades. But it is a point on a trend that shows an increase in sustainable investments over time from both public and private sectors.

These investments are already resulting in remarkable changes. Take renewable energy as an example, in 2014, about half of all energy-generating capacity built in the previous year was renewable. The Africa Renewable Energy Initiative is working to mobilize billions of dollars in public and private financing to achieve 10,000 MW of installed renewables capacity on the continent by 2020.

These remarkable statistics speak to two shifts that will need to continue in order to achieve the SDGs. The first is increased alignment of public-policy and private-sector initiatives. The second is the ability of public finance to catalyze private investment.

On technology, policy and governance, we have already seen the potential of partnerships to change the world.

Thirty years ago, the international community came together to tackle the challenge of the growing hole in the ozone layer. The result was the Montreal Protocol and the phasing out of ozone-destroying cholorfluorocarbons (CFCs). Now, the ozone layer is on track to heal by mid-century.

The UNEP-supported Partnership for Clean Fuel and Vehicles played an important convening role in phasing out lead in fuel, which has resulted in a dramatic reduction of lead-exposure health problems.

And currently, the 100-member Climate and Clean Air Coalition, which UNEP hosts, is actively working to reduce air pollution.

Cooperation engenders success. That’s why partnerships like these are at the core of the goals of sustainable development. No one government — and not even 193 of them — will be able to realize sustainable development without working together.

(Thank you to Janet Hudgins, the CPNN reporter for this article.)

Pact between the government and FARC-EP raises hopes for peace in Colombia

FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION

An article Adalys Pilar Mireles, Prensa Latina (translated by CPNN)

The agreement for justice signed between the Colombian government and the insurgent FARC-EP raises expectations about the approach of peace, after their long internal war, expectations embraced even beyond national borders.

colombia

Enacted in Cuba Wednesday [23 September], the special jurisdiction for peace foresees the creation of spaces and courts in order to investigate, prosecute and punish the actors involved in military confrontations, with the premise that crimes against humanity, extrajudicial executions and other acts considered serious will not go unpunished,.

It does include the possibility for amnesties and pardons for certain cases of political and related offenses.

Additionally, the government and the guerrilla group representatives who are negotiating an agreed solution to the long conflict, agreed to complete the talks in Havana within the next six months and then end the confrontation.

Since the agreement was signed, activists, politicians, human rights defenders and ordinary citizens have begun to publicly express their satisfaction with this agreement which addresses one of the most critical points of the agenda of talks with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia-People’s Army (FARC-EP).

Described by analysts as crucial on the road to detente, this agreement is being interpreted as a crucial step towards reconciliation in Colombia whose people have suffered more than half a century of violence now.

“We are facing a new era in which new social forces can do politics freely and safely”, Prensa Latina was told by Senator Ivan Cepeda. In his opinion, the meticulous work of a team of lawyers made possible the realization of this methodology which is designed to apply to all the actors of the conflict, not only insurgents but also agents of the State.

Meanwhile, various public personalities have indicated that this step marks a turning point in the peace negotiations that cannot be reversed.

“Peace is near,” one hears repeated in Twitter and other social media, when people begin to see the post-conflict scenario that they have awaited, after many previous attempts at negotiations between the government and the insurgents.

(article continued on the right side of the page)

(click here for the Spanish version of this article.)

Question for this article:

What is happening in Colombia, Is peace possible?

(article continued from the left side of the page)

“This is no time for hatred, we must come together to build a just society without war,” insists the Patriotic Union Party, despite having suffered in previous decades a political genocide losing nearly five thousand of its members.

“We support the agreement and ask for accelerated talks to finish the bilateral ceasefire and the end of the war,” says the statement of the Colombian Communist Party, which called upon people to the people to become active participants in the coming times, which some have called a kind of peaceful revolution.

Amid the optimism, there are also plenty of warnings to keep the eyes open for possible maneuvers of the extreme right, who have questioned the recent agreement among the warring parties.

Interior Minister, Juan Fernando Cristo, expressed his disagreement with critics in the Democratic Center Party led by former President Alvaro Uribe, and called on them to reflect and re-evaluate their position. Uribe had expressed his disagreement with the determination to apply the same principles of transitional justice to guerrillas and members of the security forces.

On the international stage, important messages support the efforts to end the confrontation, including those from presidents and other leaders as Pope Francis and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

Pacto entre Gobierno y FARC-EP aviva esperanza sobre paz en Colombia

. LIBERTAD DE INFORMACIÓN .

Un artícle de Adalys Pilar Mireles, Prensa Latina

El pacto sobre justicia rubricado entre el Gobierno colombiano y las insurgentes FARC-EP aviva las expectativas en torno a la proximidad de la paz, luego de una prolongada guerra interna, ilusión abrazada incluso más allá de las fronteras nacionales.

colombia

Promulgada en Cuba el pasado miércoles [23 Septiembre], la llamada Jurisdicción especial para la paz prevé la creación de salas y tribunales con el objetivo de investigar, juzgar y sancionar a actores de la confrontación bélica, bajo la premisa de que no quedarán impunes crímenes de lesa humanidad, las ejecuciones extrajudiciales ni otros hechos considerados graves.

No obstante incluye beneficios de amnistías e indultos para determinados casos de delitos políticos y conexos.

Adicionalmente, los representantes gubernamentales y de la agrupación guerrillera, quienes negocian una solución concertada al largo conflicto, acordaron finalizar las pláticas en La Habana a más tardar en seis meses y concluir entonces la confrontación.

A partir de entonces activistas, políticos, defensores de derechos humanos y ciudadanos de a pie comenzaron a manifestar públicamente su satisfacción por tal consenso, en uno de los puntos más críticos de la agenda de conversaciones con las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia-Ejército del Pueblo (FARC-EP).

Calificado por analistas como trascendental en el camino hacia la distensión, tal acuerdo fue interpretado igualmente como un momento crucial y de reconciliación entre los colombianos, castigados por más de medio siglo de violencia.

Estamos ante una nueva era en la cual nuevas fuerzas sociales podrán hacer política de manera libre y segura, declaró a Prensa Latina el senador Iván Cepeda.

En su opinión, el minucioso trabajo de un equipo de juristas hizo posible la concreción de esa metodología, diseñada para cobijar a todos los actores de la contienda, no sólo insurgentes sino también agentes del Estado.

Mientras, diversas personalidades del escenario público consideran que luego de tal paso las gestiones pacifistas no tienen marcha atrás.

(El artículo continúa en el lado derecho de la página)

(Clickear aqui para la version inglês.)

 

Question related to this article:

What is happening in Colombia, Is peace possible?

(El artículo continúa desde el lado izquierdo de la página)

La paz está cerca, repiten los ciudadanos a través de Twitter y otros espacios, cuando vislumbran el anhelado escenario de postconflicto, tras previos intentos de negociaciones entre el Ejecutivo y la insurgencia.

No es momento para odios, tenemos que unirnos para construir una sociedad justa y sin guerra, insistió el partido Unión Patriótica, pese a haber sufrido en décadas anteriores un genocidio político al perder a casi cinco mil de sus integrantes.

Respaldamos el pacto y pedimos acelerar los diálogos para decretar el cese el fuego bilateral y el término de la contienda, expresó en un comunicado el Partido Comunista Colombiano, que llamó al pueblo a convertirse en protagonista de los instantes venideros, durante el proceso que algunos han denominado especie de revolución pacífica.

En medio del optimismo, no faltan las alertas para mantener los ojos abiertos ante posibles maniobras de la extrema derecha, que cuestionó el reciente consenso entre las partes beligerantes.

El ministro del Interior, Juan Fernando Cristo, reprobó las críticas del partido Centro Democrático liderado por el expresidente Álvaro Uribe, y llamó a ese grupo opositor a reflexionar y revaluar su posición.

Uribe expresó su desacuerdo con la determinación de aplicar los mismos principios de justicia transicional a guerrilleros y miembros de la Fuerza Pública.

En el escenario internacional, priman los mensajes de respaldo a las gestiones para acabar con la confrontación en las voces de presidentes y otros líderes como el papa Francisco y el Secretario General de Naciones Unidas, Ban Ki-moon.

Trying to Survey Events around the World for the International Day of Peace

DISARMAMENT & SECURITY .

by David Adams, CPNN Coordinator

There are several websites that invite readers to enter their events for the International Day of Peace (IDP), but it is difficult to get an overall view of what is happening.

idp survey

Let’s start with regular websites? The website http://internationaldayofpeace.org/ has a map of the world with symbols for different kinds of events. After considerable trial and error, since there is no explanation on the page, I was able to separate most of the entries for marches, music, meditation and multiple as of September 21.

Here is what I found, separated by region of the world.

Marches: North America 20; Europe 7; Latin America 4; South Asia 4; East Asia 3; Africa 2; Middle East 1

Music: North America 23; Europe 15; East Asia 4; Middle East 3; Latin America 2; Africa 2

Meditation: North America 55; Europe 53; Africa 14; East Asia 10; South Asia 4; Middle East 5

Multiple: North America 35; Europe 30; Latin America 15; East Asia 10; South Asia 3; Africa 3; Middle East 1

This adds up to 328, while website gives a figure of 1369 events.

In many cases one can obtain information about the event by clicking on the symbol.

How about Facebook? As of September 21 the Facebook page #PeaceDay has dozens of entries every day beginning on September 10, but most of the entries do not indicate the country concerned. One of the entries #iplayforchange carries a map of 295 events in 51 countries. By clicking on the map you find photos from musicians around the world, but no detailed listing of the events. Another facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/events/461780550660626/, where today (September 21) one finds entries listed from Lebanon, Brazil, Canada, Australia, Korea, Philippines, Indonesia, United Kingdom, Argentina, Turkey, Libya, Luxembourg, etc., etc.

I get the feeling from “surfing the internet” that the IDP is being celebrated around the world to a far greater extent than we can measure. Is it increasing from one year to another? Does it mark a growing anti-war consciousness? Unfortunately, I see no way to measure this from the available data.

Question for this article:

Kashmir: KPN to celebrate International Day of Peace at Nageen today

DISARMAMENT & SECURITY .

An article by Reyaz Rashid, Kashmir Images

In bid to give peace a chance to prevail in Kashmir and make people aware about benefits of using methods of non-violence to achieve peace with justice, Kashmir Peace Network (KPN) – which had made Srinagar city a member of International Cities of Peace with 120 members around the world – is celebrating International Day of Peace at ‘Samad’s Island of Peace’ in Nageen on Monday.

kashmir

As part of 4th annual celebration of UN mandated ‘Peace One Day’ on September 21 – the International Day of Peace — KPK like other 120 member cities around the world would gather people, particularly students from high schools, colleges and universities to participate in the event in which one billion people around the world will participate.

“We have seen enough violence and bloodshed, let us give peace a chance here. We want to make people aware of the benefits using non-violence to accomplish peace with dignity, prosperity and justice,” said Executive Director KPN, Bashir Ahmed Ghakhroo, grandson of Abdul Samad Ghakhroo.

During the ‘Peace One Day’ event, students will speak on peace-related topics and peace-building measures in conflict zones like Kashmir. The students would also deliberate upon topics like ‘The Right of People to Peace’, ‘Our Individual Responsibility Towards Peace in Kashmir ‘, ‘Towards Peace and Prosperity in Kashmir’, the organizers said.

“Our organization endeavours to involve people in seminars, workshops on peace leadership training so that people can become ambassadors of peace,” added Ghakhroo.

“KPN wants to put forth real image of people of Kashmir who basically believe in peaceful and non-violent means of resolving issues and problems. The organization wants to develop Samad Peace Academy,” informed the organizers.

“We want to sow the seeds of peace in Kashmir by our small peace-building efforts and we hope our efforts would bear fruit of peace in future,” added Ghakhroo.

The organization has appealed the people to join in the Peace One Day celebrations to give peace a chance.

Question for this article:

Greenpeace honouring courage and compassion: Peace Day 2015

TOLERANCE AND SOLIDARITY .

An article by Dr Kumi Naidoo, Executive Director of Greenpeace International

I was 22 years old when I had to leave my homeland, South Africa. I had no choice. I was living underground for a year by then, to avoid being arrested. This was 1987, in the midst of one of the most bloody and violent periods in the history of Apartheid South Africa. The green peaceful streets of Oxford, where I was lucky enough to end up, seemed like a cartoon to me. They seemed unreal, while the violence I left behind felt very real and near. I stayed awake at night thinking of friends and relatives left behind.

greenpeace

I remember these feelings now every time I look at the heartbreaking images of people fleeing devastation – whether floods in Bangladesh or war in Syria. The images of desperate parents holding on to their children, trying to get them through barbed wired fences, or off small inflatable boats. I see them and I think about my own daughter. How would I feel if I was one of these parents? When I fled, I had only myself to care for.

‘No one leaves home’ writes Kenyan born Somali poet Warsan Shire, ‘unless home is the mouth of a shark’. ‘No one puts their children in a boat unless the water is safer than the land’.

21st September marks the International Day of Peace. And this year, again, there is not much peace around to celebrate.

In Syria alone – according to some estimates one of two Syrians has died or fled home since the war began. According to the UN 7.6 million are internally displaced. 4.1 million refugees are abroad. Most of them in countries surrounding Syria. Some are turning to Europe as a safe haven.

(article continued on the right side of the page)

Question for this article

The refugee crisis, Who is responsible?

Readers’ comments are invited on this question and article. See below for comments box.

(article continued from the left side of the page)

There are times when drawing borders between countries, people, between politics and the environment must stop. There comes a time when all that matters is humanity and solidarity. This is such a time. The acts of courage and compassion shown by so many individuals and communities across Europe I find deeply inspiring.

Many of my colleagues in Greenpeace are also trying to reach out and support refugees. In Hungary and Croatia, volunteers have joined the humanitarian effort, including practical things like setting up a solar charging station in hot spots so that people can recharge their phones and access WiFi. In Greece, our office is in close contact with international relief NGOs ​to support their efforts ​and is working with local groups to collect and send relief packages to the Islands where many refugees are stranded.

I want to personally thank all who are reaching out to help. In this moving ocean of solidarity, every drop matters. We must all join together and say loud and clear: #Refugeeswelcome!

Tomorrow I travel to New York to attend the UN Summit on Sustainable Development Goals. My trip will be an easy one, but I will remember those times when my journeys, too, were journeys of fear. I will think of those facing days, months and years of relentless, life threatening journeys, with no guaranteed safety at the end of the road.

As fellow human beings we owe it to them to raise our voices, to stand in solidarity and to address the root causes of global insecurity. We need to insist on finding real solutions – including getting off fossil fuels. Conflicts are always complex. But looking at current conflicts from Iraq, Ukraine, Sudan, the South China Sea to Nigeria it is clear that the access, the transport and thus the dependence on fossil fuels do play a role.

“Resource wars” are not new. But today we can overcome them. In New York, I will argue for a world powered by 100% renewables for all by 2050. This world is in our grasp, our latest Energy Revolution scenario shows that without doubt. It is also the world we must choose if we want peace. Wind turbines, photovoltaic systems, insulation materials or double glazed windows are the “weapons” we must deploy to help create a safer world.

I was lucky enough to see Apartheid ended by people power and international solidarity a few years after I was forced to leave South Africa. Apartheid was abolished, and I am now free to return. Will those displaced now ever have that privilege? I do not know. But we must work for the peaceful, safe world for all, that would make this possible.

2015 MacBride Prize to Lampedusa (Italy) and Gangjeon Village, Jeju Island (S. Korea)

TOLERANCE AND SOLIDARITY .

A press release by The International Peace Bureau

The International Peace Bureau is delighted to announce its decision to award the annual Sean MacBride Peace Prize to two island communities who, in different circumstances, show proof of a profound commitment to peace and social justice.

ipb prize

LAMPEDUSA is a small island in the Mediterranean and is the southernmost part of Italy. Being the closest part of the territory to the African coastline, it has been since the early 2000s a primary European entry point for migrants and refugees. The numbers of persons arriving has been rapidly increasing, with hundreds of thousands at risk while travelling, and over 1900 deaths in 2015 alone.

The people of the island of Lampedusa have given the world an extraordinary example of human solidarity, offering clothing, shelter and food to those who have arrived, in distress, on their shores. The response of the Lampedusans stands out in stark contrast to the behaviour and official policies of the European Union, apparently intent only on reinforcing their borders in the attempt to keep these migrants out. This ‘Fortress Europe’ policy is becoming more and more militarised.

Aware of its multi‐layered culture, which epitomizes the evolution of the Mediterranean region where over the centuries different civilizations have blended and built on each others’ developments, with mutual enrichment, the island of Lampedusa also shows the world that a culture of hospitality and respect for human dignity are the most effective antidotes to nationalism and religious fundamentalism.

To give but one example of the heroic actions of the people of Lampedusa, let us recall the events of the night of 7‐8 May 2011. A boat full of migrants crashed into a rocky outcrop, not far from the shore. Although it was in the middle of the night, the inhabitants of Lampedusa turned out in their hundreds to form a human chain between the shipwreck and the coast. That night alone more than 500 people, including many children, were carried to safety.

At the same time the people of the island are very clear that the problem is a European one, not theirs alone. In November 2012, Mayor Nicolini sent an urgent appeal to Europe’s leaders. She expressed her outrage that the European Union, which had just received the Nobel Peace Prize, was ignoring the tragedies occurring on its Mediterranean borders.

The IPB believes that the dramatic situation in the Mediterranean – constantly visible in the mass media ‐ must be at the top of Europe’s urgent priorities. Much of the problem springs from social injustices and inequalities resulting in conflicts in which the West has – over centuries ‐‐ played an aggressive role. We recognise that there are no easy solutions, but as a guiding principle, Europe should be honouring the ideals of human solidarity, over and above the cynical considerations of governments and profit/power/resource‐seeking entities. When Europe contributes to the ruining of the livelihoods of people, as for instance in Iraq and Libya, Europe will have to find ways to help rebuild those livelihoods. It should be below the dignity of Europe to spend billions on military interventions, and yet not to have the resources available to meet the basic needs. The most vital question is how to develop cooperation between people of goodwill on both sides of the Mediterranean in a long‐term, constructive, gender‐sensitive and sustainable process.

(article continued on the right side of the page)

Question for this article

The refugee crisis, Who is responsible?

Readers’ comments are invited on this question and article. See below for comments box.

(article continued from the left side of the page)

GANGJEON VILLAGE is the site of the controversial 50‐hectare Jeju Naval Base being constructed by the South Korean government on the southern coast of Jeju Island, at a projected cost of nearly $1 billion. The waters around the island are protected by international law as they are within a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve (in October 2010, nine geological sites on on the island were recognised as Global Geoparks by the UNESCO Global Geoparks Network). Even so, the construction of the base continues, although building work has been halted many times by mass protests of people concerned about the base’s environmental impact. These people see the base as a US‐driven project aimed at containing China, rather than enhancing South Korean security In July 2012, the South Korean Supreme Court upheld the base’s construction. It is expected to host up to 24 US and allied military vessels, including 2 Aegis destroyers and 6 nuclear submarines, plus occasional civilian cruise ships on completion (now scheduled for 2016).

Jeju Island has been dedicated to peace ever since around 30,000 were massacred there from 1948‐54, following a peasant uprising against US occupation. The South Korean government apologized for the massacre in 2006 and the late President Roh Moo Hyun officially named Jeju an “Island of World Peace”. This violent history helps to explain why the people of Gangjeon Village (population 2000) have been protesting non‐violently for around 8 years against the naval base project. According to Medea Benjamin of Code Pink, “About 700 people have been arrested and charged with hefty fines that amount to over $400,000, fines that they cannot or will not pay. Many have spent days or weeks or months in jail, including a well‐known film critic Yoon Mo Yong who spent 550 days in prison after committing multiple acts of civil disobedience.” The energy and commitment shown by the villagers has attracted the support (and participation) of activists from around the world. We endorse the construction of a permanent Peace Center on the site which can act as a focus for activities reflecting alternative views to those represented by the militarists.

IPB makes the award in order to increase the visibility of this exemplary non‐violent
struggle at a crucial time. It takes great courage to physically oppose the government’s growing aggressive and militaristic policies, especially as they are backed by, and at the service of, the Pentagon. It takes even more courage to maintain that struggle over a period of many years.

CONCLUSION
There is an important connection between the two situations. Not only do we recognise the common humanity of those who resist without weapons the forces of domination in their own island. We make the argument that public resources should not be spent on massive military installations that only increase the tension between nations in the region; rather they should be devoted to meeting human need. If we continue devoting the world’s resources to military rather than humanistic purposes, it is inevitable that we will continue to witness these inhuman situations with desperate people, refugees and migrants, at risk while crossing the seas and at the prey of unscrupulous gangs. Thus we repeat also in this context the basic message of IPB’s Global Campaign on Military Spending: Move the Money!

Angola: Executivo defende cultura de paz

. PARTICIPACIÓN DEMOCRATICA .

Um artigo de Jaquelino Figueiredo e Fernando Neto, Jornal de Angola

A cultura de paz constitui uma necessidade premente para a convivência harmoniosa entre os homens em África, afirmou sábado, no Soyo, o secretário de Estado das Relações Exteriores.

angola
Fotografia: Jaquelino Figueiredo

Manuel Augusto, que discursava no acto de encerramento da Conferência Internacional sobre a Cultura de Paz, organizada pela Fundação Eduardo dos Santos (FESA), disse que os participantes analisaram as causas dos conflitos e as suas trágicas consequências.

O secretário de Estado enfatizou a necessidade de acções tendentes não só a instituir, mas também a contribuir para a assumpção colectiva da importância da cultura de paz. “É neste contexto de pragmatismo e de consciência colectiva da cultura de paz que se enquadram os seis níveis de dimensão enunciados por Sua Excelência o Presidente da República de Angola, José Eduardo dos Santos e Patrono da FESA, por ocasião da Conferência Internacional sobre a Cultura de Paz, realizada em Luanda, em Março de 2013, numa iniciativa conjunta entre o Governo angolano, a UNESCO e a União Africana”, referiu.

Manuel Augusto disse que o facto da cultura de paz não ser uma acção pontual, mas sim um processo permanente e dinâmico, que o Governo angolano assumiu a responsabilidade de realizar no próximo ano o Fórum para a Cultura de Paz em África, com o apoio da UNESCO e da União Africana. “Esta proposta foi aceite e endossada pelos chefes de Estados africanos na sua cimeira ordinária de Julho de 2014. Quiseram assim, Angola e o seu líder, partilhar com o resto do Mundo a sua própria experiência e, deste modo, contribuir de forma concreta para divulgação, sensibilização e adopção da cultura de paz”, sustentou.

O membro do Executivo considerou que a participação de prelectores e especialistas de diferentes partes do Mundo e de instituições internacionais de reputada competência acrescentaram, não só prestígio e visibilidade à iniciativa da FESA, mas também a garantia de que a compilação das comunicações apresentadas constitui matéria de estudo e pesquisa para dirigentes, académicos, estudantes e a sociedade civil em geral. Os participantes da Conferência Internacional sobre a Cultura de Paz recomendaram às instituições de pesquisa académica uma reflexão sobre a cidadania em África, na sua perspectiva histórica, sociológica e cultural. A valorização e o fortalecimento da tradição oral como veículo de transmissão dos valores culturais é, também, uma recomendação da conferência.

Os participantes à Conferência Internacional sobre Cultura de Paz, realizada sexta-feira e sábado na cidade do Soyo, província do Zaire, reconheceram o papel interventivo de Angola na resolução de conflitos a nível do continente africano, constatou o presidente da FESA.

Ismael Diogo da Silva, que considerou amplamente positivo o encontro, que reuniu cerca de 500 participantes, dos quais 90 estrangeiros provenientes de vários países de África, disse que todos os intervenientes foram unânimes de que Angola é um exemplo na resolução de conflitos, tendo em consideração os esforços da liderança do Presidente José Eduardo dos Santos em manter a paz. Para os angolanos, disse, isso deve ser motivo de orgulho e de incentivo ao diálogo permanente.

O presidente da FESA considerou que a declaração final recomenda a continuidade da discussão do tema sobre a cultura de paz, no sentido de persuadir os líderes a não enveredarem pelo caminho de conflitos, mas sim identificarem as grandes razões com vista à promoção do diálogo e do entendimento. A conferência permitou a interacção com os prelectores africanos e a FESA conseguiu trazer políticos, pesquisadores e professores catedráticos trazer à discussão sobre a cultura de paz.

“Conseguimos ouvir políticos, pesquisadores e professores catedráticos e muitos deles membros de academias internacionais sobre cultura de paz, sobre democracia, cidadania, especialistas da UNESCO e deixaram-nos uma nítida mensagem de encorajamento que Angola está no caminho certo”, disse.

(Clique aqui para uma tradução em Inglês deste artigo)

(Question for this article:)

Angola: Executive defends culture of peace

. DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION .

An article by Jaquelino Figueiredo and Fernando Neto, Jornal de Angola (translation by CPNN)

“The culture of peace is an urgent need for the harmonious coexistence among the people of Africa”, according to the remarks of the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs on Saturday in Soyo,.

angola
Photography: Jaquelino Figueiredo

Manuel Augusto, who was speaking at the closing ceremony of the International Conference on the Culture of Peace, organized by the Eduardo dos Santos Foundation (FESA), said the participants analyzed the causes of conflicts and their tragic consequences.

The Secretary of State emphasized the need for actions aimed not only to establish, but also to contribute to the collective understanding of the importance of a culture of peace. He said, “It is in this context of pragmatism and collective awareness of the culture of peace that fall under the six dimensional levels set out by His Excellency the President of Angola, José Eduardo dos Santos and Patron of FESA, at the International Conference on Culture Peace, held in Luanda in March 2013, a joint initiative between the Angolan Government, UNESCO and the African Union.”

Manuel Augusto said that the culture of peace just one specific action, but rather an ongoing and dynamic process. For this, the Angolan Government has taken the responsibility to carry out next year the Forum for the Culture of Peace in Africa, with the support of UNESCO and the African Union. “This proposal was accepted and endorsed by African Heads of States in their Summit of July 2014. Angola and its leader will share with the rest of the world their own experience and thus contribute concretely to the dissemination, awareness and adoption of a culture of peace “, he said.

The Executive considered that the participation of lecturers and experts from different parts of the world and international institutions of recognized competence will add not only prestige and visibility to the initiative of FESA, but also the assurance that the compilation of the papers presented will become a matter of study and research for leaders, academics, students and civil society in general. The participants of the International Conference on Culture of Peace recommended to academic research institutions a reflection on citizenship in Africa, its historical, sociological and cultural perspective. The enhancement and strengthening of oral tradition as a vehicle of transmission of cultural values ​​is also a recommendation of the conference.

The participants to the International Conference on Culture of Peace, held Friday and Saturday in Soyo, northern Zaire province, acknowledged the active role of Angola in resolving conflicts in the African continent, according to the chairman of FESA. Ismael Diogo da Silva, considering the meeting which brought together about 500 participants, including 90 foreigners from various countries in Africa, said all participants were unanimous that Angola is an example in conflict resolution, taking into consideration the efforts of the leadership of President José Eduardo dos Santos to keep the peace. For Angolans, he said, it should be cause for pride and to encourage the ongoing dialogue.

The chairman of FESA noted that the final declaration recommends the continuation of the theme of the discussion of the culture of peace, to persuade leaders not to take the path of conflict, but rather identify the major reasons for the promotion of dialogue and understanding.

The conference allowed interaction with African lecturers and FESA and managed to bring politicians, researchers and professors to the discussion of the culture of peace.

“We have heard politicians, researchers and professors, many of them members of international academies of culture of peace, of democracy, citizenship and UNESCO. They have left us with a clear message of encouragement that Angola is on track,” he said.

(click here for the original Portuguese version of this article)

(Question for this article:)

Music Builds Peace One Day at a Time

EDUCATION FOR PEACE .

An article by Jeremy Gilley in Huffington Post (reprinted according to principles of “fair use”)

Music has always played a vital role championing social causes; whether through bringing musicians together to challenge injustice, raise funds for the disadvantaged or, in fact, to demonstrate to the world a rich and vibrant culture that is under threat. Music speaks to everyone; irrespective of background, age, religion, political opinions or wealth, everyone can find something that connects them with another through music.

Gilley
Video of Peace Day Anthem

Peace One Day has been campaigning for over 17 years, making the case for Peace Day, an annual day of global ceasefire and non-violence, 21 September. On this journey we have worked with every sector of society and music has been a powerful vehicle to bring people together on the day. We have held concerts around the world including Derry-Londonderry, the Peace Palace in The Hague (the home of the ICJ), and last year in Goma, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Artists such as Annie Lennox, Akon, Elton John, Youssou N’Dour, Lexxus Legal and many more have performed in celebration of the only day of peace the world as one has.

This year, music for Peace Day takes on a new and inspiring dimension with ‘ONE’, the Peace Day anthem by Coke Studio in Nairobi. Bringing musicians together from five African countries this song celebrates the power of peace to unite people and champion our common humanity. Musicians include Zwai Bala (South Africa), Ice Prince (Nigeria) Maurice Kirya (Uganda), Alikiba (Tanzania), Wangechi (Kenya) and Dama Do Bling (Mozambique) have come together in this unique track, offering the world’s peacemakers and champions an anthem to unite behind and celebrate.

The anthem will be premiered at the Peace One Day Youth Celebration held on Peace Day in the Petit Stade Amahoro in Kigali, Rwanda which features performances from artists from across the Great Lakes region of Africa including Congolese musician, Innoss’B, Rwandan performers including Knowless, Urban Boyz, dance crews, Jabba Junior & Krest Crew and the pan-African choir, the African Children’s Choir. Using music, dance, film and more, Peace Day will empower the peacemakers of the future to become to driving force behind a more peaceful and sustainable world. What better way to amplify this message than an anthem bringing together music fans from around the world?

On Peace Day, ‘ONE’ will be available for download on a number of download sites including iTunes, Google Play and Amazon, so everyone will have the chance to own this part of Peace Day history and share it with their friends and family, spreading the message of Peace Day further around the world. This anthem is supporting our work to raise awareness of Peace Day, 21 September in the Great Lakes region of Africa and across the world. We are grateful to the Howard G. Buffett Foundation for making this possible.

Peace Day, 21 September is about building peace one day at a time and through music we can unite people behind this message, celebrating hope, our common humanity and lasting peace.

Question for this article: