Boletín español el 1 de setiembre 2015

COLOMBIA SE PREPARA PARA PAZ

A medida que el gobierno de Colombia y las FARC entran el ciclo 40 de las conversaciones por la paz para, el pueblo de Colombia están optimistas de que está llegando en fin del conflicto armado de más de medio siglo .que ha desgarrado su país, y se están preparando para la paz.

Las conversaciones de paz  comenzaron de nuevo en el 20 de agosto en La Habana con “una renovación de la confianza en el proceso de paz, generada por la voluntad de las partes para acelerar el ritmo en La Habana y de de-escalada de la violencia en Colombia”. Entre sus decisiones en las conversaciones recientes está la promesa de crear una comisión de la verdad. Según un reciente estudio realizado por la Naciones Unidas, a medida que las conversaciones de paz han avanzado, el nivel de violencia ha disminuido.

Como Amada Benavides explica en su carta a CPNN de Colombia, “El proceso de negociación de un acuerdo de paz con las FARC ha avanzado muchos temas, entre ellos la educación para la paz. Por primera vez en Colombia se está explícitamente mencionado, y no por otros nombres, y en este sentido tenemos varias iniciativas nuevas… [incluyendo el] Reunión Nacional sobre la Educación para la Paz , que se celebrará el 1 y 2 de octubre “. Y añade: “Dado que hemos estado trabajando más de 15 años para presentar la necesidad de la educación para la paz en Colombia, esto es realmente un momento muy emocionante.”

Educación para la paz está convirtiendo en una asignatura obligatoria en las escuelas de Colombia. Según la ley 1732, adoptada en 2014, el gobierno nacional ha decretado que “la enseñanza de la Paz está regulada en todas las instituciones educativas del país”. Cultura de paz y el desarrollo sostenible se llevarán a cabo en el programa académico antes de diciembre 31 de 2015, en las áreas de ciencias sociales, la historia, la geografía, la política y la constitución de la democracia, ciencias de la vida, la educación ambiental, la ética, los valores y principios humanos.

Hay muchas iniciativas de paz locales y regionales en el contexto de las negociaciones entre el gobierno y las FARC:

Un precedente importante en los últimos años se ha establecido por la Comunidad de Paz de San José de Apartadó, establecido formalmente en 1996, que ha resistido a la participación en la guerra civil a través de una amplia gama de tácticas no violentas comprendida entre declaraciones públicas y la creación de instituciones y mercados educativos alternativos. Esta impresionante diversidad táctica ha ganado considerable apoyo internacional y, a este día, ayuda a mantener la libertad de la Comunidad.

En Cundinamarca una reunión regional se dedicó a fortalecer la política nacional de la convivencia y la seguridad en el tema de la reconciliación.  Jerónimo Gordillo, secretario de Gobierno de Cundinamarca, dijo que es responsabilidad de los alcaldes y defensores del pueblo manejar de manera eficiente el proceso de paz.

En la ciudad de San Agustín, la Facultad de Educación de la Universidad Surcolombiana celebró la  primera Bienal Internacional de la educación y cultura de la paz del 13 al 15 agosto.

En Cartagena, fue convocada la primera reunión regional para construir un Asamblea Regional para Paz del Caribe. La reunión fue apoyada por el sindicato laboral de los trabajadores -USO- y la empresa Ecopetrol.  Asistieron delegados de Atlántico, Bolívar, Sucre, Córdoba, Cesar y Guajira.

En Bogotá, más de 350.000 personas asistieron al Festival Rock al Parque que fue dedicado este año a la cultura de la paz.

A nivel nacional, la Segunda Asamblea Nacional por la Paz se llevará a cabo en noviembre. Se incluirá cuatro conversaciones y 10 asambleas regionales que tendrán lugar en Antioquia, Barrancabermeja, Cartagena, Choco, Villavicencio, Neiva, Puerto Asís, Tibú, Arauca y Popayán. Se centrarán en tres temas: 1) la política de la minería y la energía; 2) el desarrollo regional y la consolidación de la paz; y 3) la cultura de la paz y el seguimiento de los acuerdos de paz.

En muchas regiones remotas de Colombia, la radio es el único medio de comunicación al que las personas tienen  acceso. Por esta razón, la Oficina del Alto Comisionado para la Paz de este año comenzó a capacitar a periodistas y locutores que trabajan en cientos de pequeñas estaciones de radio comunitarias en todo el país para administrar los programas que traen los ciudadanos en contacto con el proceso de paz.

En suma, el pueblo de Colombia se está preparando para la paz en todos los niveles, que nos proporciona lecciones para la eventual transición de la cultura de guerra mundial a una cultura de paz.

      

LIBERTAD DE INFORMACIÓN

benavides

Carta de Colombia

IGUALDAD HOMBRES/MUJERES



To Hell and Back: How Rwanda’s Women Helped It Become a World Leader

DESARME Y SEGURIDAD




CICR: Comercio de Armas: debemos poner fin a la transferencia ilegal de armas

DERECHOS HUMANOS



UN: Worldwide displacement hits all-time high as war and persecution increase

DESAROLLO SUSTENTABLE



ONU: Líderes mundiales logran consenso sobre la nueva Agenda para el Desarrollo Sostenible

PARTICIPACIÓN DEMOCRATICA



Côte d’Ivoire: REPSFECO-CI promotes a peaceful electoral process

TOLERANCIA Y SOLIDARIDAD



A gathering of young peace-builders towards a strengthened policy framework on Youth, Peace and Security

EDUCACIÓN PARA PAZ



Colombie: Rock al Parque 2015 – Una Tendencia del Siglo XXI

English bulletin September 1 2015

. COLOMBIA PREPARES FOR PEACE .

As the government of Colombia and the FARC enter their 40th cycle of peace talks, the people of Colombia are optimistic that an end is in sight to the half century of civil war that has torn their country apart and they are preparing for peace.

The peace talks reconvened August 20 in Havana with “a renewal of confidence in the peace process, spawned by the parties’  expressed willingness to accelerate the pace in Havana and to de-escalate the violence in Colombia.” Among their decisions in recent talks was the promise to create a truth commission. As the peace talks have advanced, the amount of violence has decreased according to a recent study by the United Nations.

As Amada Benevides explains in her letter to CPNN from Colombia, “The process of negotiating a peace agreement with the FARC has advanced many topics, including education for peace. For the first time in Colombia it is being mentioned explicitly, and not by other names, and in this sense we have several new initiatives . . . [including a] National Meeting on Education for Peace, to be held on 1 and 2 October.” She adds, “Since we have been working more than 15 years to put forward the necessity of peace education in Colombia, this is really a very exciting time.”

Peace education is becoming a required subject in the schools of Colombia. According to law 1732, adopted in 2014, the national government has decreed that “the teaching of Peace is regulated in all educational institutions of the country”. Culture of peace and sustainable development are to be implemented in the academic syllabus before December 31, 2015, in the areas of social sciences, history, geography, politics and democracy constitution, life sciences, environmental education, ethics, human values and principles.

There are many local and regional peace initiatives in the context of the talks between the government and FARC:

An important precedent over the years has been set by the Peace Community of San José de Apartadó, formally established in 1996, which has been able to resist involvement in the civil war by means of a vast array of nonviolent tactics ranging from public declarations to establishing alternative educational institutions and markets. This impressive tactical diversity has gained considerable international support and, to this day, helps sustain the Community’s resilience. 

In Cundinamarca a regional meeting was devoted to strengthening the national policy of coexistence and security in the issue of reconciliation. Jerome Gordillo, secretary of Government of Cundinamarca, said that is the responsibility of mayors and ombudsmen to efficiently handle the peace process.

In the city of San Agustin, the Faculty of Education of Surcolombiana University held the first International Biennial of education and culture of peace from 13 to August 15.

In Cartagena, the first regional meeting was held to construct a Caribbean Regional Peace Assembly. The meeting was supported by the workers’ labor union -USO- and the company Ecopetrol. It was attended by delegates from Atlantico, Bolivar, Sucre, Córdoba, Cesar and Guajira.

In Bogota, more than 350,000 people attended the Rock in the Park Festival which was dedicated this year to the culture of peace.

At a national level, the Second National Assembly for Peace will take place in November. It will will include four conversations and 10 regional assemblies which will take place in Antioquia, Barrancabermeja, Cartagena, Choco, Villavicencio, Neiva, Puerto Asis, Tibu, Arauca and Popayan. They will focus on three themes: 1) mining and energy policy; 2) regional development and peacebuilding and 3), culture of peace and followup to the peace accords.

In many remote regions in Colombia, radio is the only medium to which people have access. For this reason, the Office of the High Commissioner for Peace this year began training journalists and announcers working at hundreds of small community radio stations across the country to manage programs that bring citizens in touch with the ongoing peace process.

In sum, the people of Colombia are preparing for peace at all levels, providing us lessons for the eventual transition from the global culture of war to a culture of peace.

      

FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION

benavides

Letter from Colombia

WOMEN’S EQUALITY



To Hell and Back: How Rwanda’s Women Helped It Become a World Leader

DISARMAMENT AND SECURITY




ICRC re Arms Trade Treaty: We must stop irresponsible arms trade or transfers

HUMAN RIGHTS



UN: Worldwide displacement hits all-time high as war and persecution increase

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT



UN: Consensus Reached on New Sustainable Development Agenda to be adopted by World Leaders in September

DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION



Côte d’Ivoire: REPSFECO-CI promotes a peaceful electoral process

TOLERANCE AND SOLIDARITY



A gathering of young peace-builders towards a strengthened policy framework on Youth, Peace and Security

EDUCATION FOR PEACE



Colombia: Rock in the Park 2015 – Music for the 21st Century

Why radio is proving the best medium to promote Colombia’s peace process

FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION

Reproduced by permission from ©ELIZABETH REYES L./EDICIONES EL PAÍS, SL 2015, translated by Martin Delfín

“I want to say my husband’s name, Luis Javier Laverde Salazar, because naming him is keeping him alive in my memory and remembering him will prevent him from falling into obscurity.”

radio
Journalists participate in a training session at a community broadcast. / KEWIN SANTOS

That was the message repeated for five minutes by Luz Helena Galeano during a recent broadcast on Esquina Radio, a community radio station located in the Colombian city of Medellín.

Playing in the background as she spoke was Mujer Divina, a popular hit by late salsa singer Joe Cuba that Galeano explained her husband would often sing. Laverde Salazar was taken by a group of paramilitaries on December 9, 2008 and has not been heard from since.

Esquina Radio is one of many stations across Colombia taking part in a new project aimed at bringing citizens in touch with the ongoing peace process between the government and insurgent and paramilitary groups. The short programs also serve as a platform to help discover the whereabouts of some of the thousands of victims of the decades-long conflict that has divided the country.

Juan Gabriel Vanegas is the producer of Esquina Radio’s Memorias (Memories), a five-minute program that can be heard in downtown Medellín and some of the city’s outlying eastern areas.

The format allows family members to broadcast the name of a wife, husband, child or other loved one who has been a victim of the armed conflict so that they may never be forgotten.

Vanegas’s spot was one of around 50 programs that took part in a national radio contest held with the aim of telling stories about truth, memory, reconciliation and the building of peace in Colombia.

(article continued on the right side of the page)

(click here for the Spanish version of this article.)

Question for this article:

What is happening in Colombia, Is peace possible?

Journalism in Latin America: Is it turning towards a culture of peace?

How can peace be promoted by radio?

(article continued from the left side of the page)

While the government of President Juan Manuel Santos has made reconciliation part of his agenda for the peace talks now taking place in Havana with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), many Colombians feel distant from the process.

Some communities affected by the conflict have questioned whether they will receive any special benefits if and when a peace treaty is signed.

For this reason, the Office of the High Commissioner for Peace this year began training journalists and announcers working at hundreds of small community radio stations across the country.

In many remote regions in Colombia, radio is the only medium to which people have access.

“The [Havana] peace talks were something that was going on thousands of kilometers from here,” explains Ivonne Pico, a member of the Resander media cooperative in the Santander region, which is also taking part in the journalist training project.

“We had to begin by explaining what was being discussed and what isn’t being negotiated. We also gave advice on how to go about informing listeners,” explains Pico, who adds that the radio announcers need to understand how the peace process works.

After that came the stories. These aren’t about the Havana talks, but about reconciliation and forging peace in the different communities affected by the violence. People from all parts of the country have given their suggestions on how to bring about peaceful co-existence in their towns and villages.

“It is a peace that doesn’t just begin or end in Havana,” says José Luis Muñoz, another project trainer.

The stories are all available to be downloaded and used by community stations from the Contamos para la paz (We speak for peace) website.

They are full of lessons of hope and resistance, and include testimonies from women, hip-hop artists, soccer players, teachers who saved their students from being recruited by the guerrillas and paramilitaries, and displaced residents who returned to their communities only to find them ransacked and destroyed.

“Telling stories is powerful – it shows new paths, reveals the people behind the stories, and shapes communities,” says Muñoz.

Air time is also given to those who are angry about the many kidnappings and others who want alternatives to growing coca.

But most of them agree that peace can only be accomplished on a day-by-day basis.

“In those regions, where blood has been shed, we also have the possibility of beginning to rewrite history,” says Pico.

La radio, instrumento para explicar la paz en zonas remotas de Colombia

. LIBERTAD DE INFORMACIÓN .

Reproducido con permiso de ©ELIZABETH REYES L./EDICIONES EL PAÍS, SL 2015

“Yo nombro a mi esposo Luis Javier Laverde Salazar, porque nombrarlo es tener memoria y tener memoria es no llegar al olvido”.
La que habla es Luz Helena Galeano. Está en la radio y durante cinco minutos repetirá dos veces más la misma frase. Al fondo se escucha una estrofa de Mujer Divina, esa salsa pegajosa de Joe Cuba…
“Mulata, mi prieta, mi cielo, te quiero, te adoro, divina mujer”… Luz Helena tararea lo que le cantaba su esposo y cuenta sin afanes que desapareció el 9 de diciembre de 2008 en la comuna 13 de Medellín.
Un grupo de paramilitares lo bajó de un bus y, desde entonces, desconoce su paradero.

radio
Periodistas en uno de los talleres sobre narrativas radiales de paz. / KEWIN SANTOS

El programa radial se llama Memorias en voz alta del productor Juan Gabriel Vanegas y fue transmitido en Esquina Radio, una emisora comunitaria de Medellín que se escucha en el centro y las comunas del oriente de la ciudad. Es corto, pero contundente. Cinco minutos para reivindicar a una víctima del conflicto armado que tenía nombre, una esposa y dos hijas.

El trabajo de Vanegas participó, con otros 51, en un concurso nacional de radio, cuyo propósito era contar historias que hablaran de verdad, de memoria, de reconciliación y de construcción de la paz. Un tema que, aunque está en el centro de la agenda del Gobierno por cuenta de las negociaciones de paz con las FARC, muchos lo sienten lejano y ajeno.

El presidente Santos y sus negociadores lo saben. Incluso reconocen que no han sabido comunicar de la mejor manera lo que ocurre en La Habana con las negociaciones de paz. ¿Qué se negocia? ¿En qué beneficia a las comunidades que viven, por ejemplo, en las regiones donde la guerra se ha ensañado? Las preguntas abundan y también los falsos mitos. Por eso, desde hace un año la Oficina del Alto Comisionado de Paz empezó a preparar a informadores que trabajan en emisoras comunitarias, las cuales, en muchas ocasiones son el único medio que existe en cientos de poblados alejados de las grandes ciudades.

(El artículo continúa en el lado derecho de la página)

(Clickear aqui para la version inglês.))

 

Question related to this article:

What is happening in Colombia, Is peace possible?

(El artículo continúa desde el lado izquierdo de la página)

Había que romper el hielo, dicen los formadores. “La paz (de La Habana) era un tema que pasaba a miles de kilómetros de los territorios”, cuenta Ivonne Pico, integrante de Resander, la red cooperativa de medios comunitarios de Santander, socio estratégico en la formación. Esta red notó que el espacio que tenían estas emisoras para hablar de las negociaciones o de la paz en general, era muy pequeño y que el escepticismo abunda. Hay otros casos, en que hablar de la paz es definitivamente un tema vetado, por lo complejo de la guerra. “Nos tocó empezar por explicar lo que sí se discute y lo que no entra en las negociaciones. También se dieron pistas sobre cómo informar”, cuenta Pico y aclara que no se trata de que los informadores sean “animadores del proceso”, pero sí de que lo entiendan.

Luego vinieron las historias. No del proceso de paz, sino de cómo, desde esos territorios alejados de los reflectores se puede construir paz o se ha venido construyendo. De nuevo, en talleres, pero esta vez de producción en caliente, cientos de informadores trabajaron para hacer 21 radio-revistas que, desde una narrativa muy particular, agrupan 178 experiencias de paz. “Una paz que no comienza ni termina en La Habana”, dice José Luis Muñoz, otro de los formadores. De todos los rincones del país surgen los relatos de la convivencia.

En las piezas de radio sobresalen lecciones de resistencia y esperanza. Hay historias de mujeres valientes, de cantantes de hip hop, de jóvenes futbolistas, de profesores que salvan a sus estudiantes del reclutamiento, de comunidades que retornaron a sus pueblos arrasados por la guerra. También, de pueblos indignados por el secuestro y de otros que apostaron a sustituir los cultivos de coca.
Muchos de los protagonistas coinciden en que la paz puede construirse desde la cotidianidad. “Contar historias es poderoso, muestra caminos, revela personajes, dibuja territorios”, dice Muñoz. “Es en esos territorios, donde ha corrido sangre, donde también tenemos la posibilidad de empezar a reescribir la historia”, agrega Pico.

Los programas están alojados en la página Contamos para la paz y pueden reproducirse libremente en las emisoras comunitarias del país.
También están varias de las historias que ganaron el concurso de radio. El primer lugar se lo llevó Jorge Arias, un informador del sur de país que en nueve minutos cuenta la insólita historia de cómo en un pequeña pedanía asediada por la violencia, se idearon códigos secretos para poder comunicarse a través de altavoces, sin arriesgar la vida.

“Queríamos que la gente no se sintiera sola”, dice uno de esos informadores de la Colombia profunda.

Colombia: Highlights of the 39th Cycle of Peace Talks in Havana

FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION

A blog from Virginia Bouvier, US Institute of Peace (abridged)

As the Colombian government and the FARC prepare to return to the peace table in Havana tomorrow, August 20th, for the 40th cycle of talks, I offer here a brief recap and analysis of the flurry of activities since my last post on the peace process in mid-July.

bouvier

The Interlude between Sessions

When the 38th cycle closed on July 12, following the most violent period seen since the beginning of peace talks in 2012, the Colombian government and the FARC peace delegations issued a joint statement committing themselves to a new dual strategy that would hasten a final peace accord in Havana on the one hand,  and de-escalate the conflict in Colombia on the other.  (See joint statement here.)

The first part of the strategy includes “technical, continuous and simultaneous work on the key points of the Agenda while the accords are being crafted at the table.”  In particular, the parties agreed to move forward on establishing the terms for a bilateral ceasefire and the setting aside of arms.  To this effect, they invited the UN Secretary General and the UNASUR president (currently Uruguay) to delegate representatives to serve on the Technical Subcommission on Ending the Conflict in Havana in order to help them design relevant systems for monitoring and verification.

Complementing this intensification of technical work, In relation to the second part of the strategy, the FARC extended the unilateral ceasefire it had announced on July 8 from one month to four months, and the government said it would undertake de-escalation and confidence-building measures, as yet to be defined, in tandem with the FARC’s ability to maintain the unilateral suspension of “all offensive actions.”  (See Santos’s statement here.) . . .

Mood Shifts for 39th Cycle of Talks 

During the 39th round of talks that began on July 23 and ended on August 2, there seemed to be a renewal of confidence in the peace process, spawned by the parties’  expressed willingness to accelerate the pace in Havana and to de-escalate the violence in Colombia.  The unilateral ceasefire and the suspension of the bombings, FARC lead negotiator Iván Márquez noted, “unleashed this new ambience of confidence that has allowed the talks to speed up and to advance new consensuses.” (See Márquez’s statement here.)

(Article continued in right column)

Question(s) related to this article:

What is happening in Colombia, Is peace possible?

(Article continued from left column)

There were a number of additional advances during the 39th round:

▪ The parties produced a report on the joint de-mining project underway in Antioquia with the Colombian Army and the FARC (View the report here.);

▪ Peace delegation members in Havana were reinforced with new team members and advisors;

▪ Discussions moved forward on preliminary agreements for an integrated approach to truth, justice, reparations and non-repetition; and

▪ Work of the technical subcommission for ending the conflict continued to refine strategies for a final bilateral ceasefire and cessation of hostilities. . .

Victims and Transitional Justice

During the 39th cycle, the parties continued to work on the issue of victims, including the related issues of truth, justice, reparations, and guarantees of non-repetition.  According to lead negotiator Iván Márquez, the parties are designing an “unprecedented and innovative” integrated system to put these different aspects of victims’ rights at the center of the process.  (See more here.)

Civil Society Demands Inclusion 

While Havana negotiators have debated the details of the agenda in relative isolation, civil society has continued to make known its desire to be more regularly engaged in the process, including at the peace tables themselves.  On August 12, Todd Howland, Colombia representative of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights, called on the parties to invite authorities of the indigenous and Afro-Colombian communities to the peace table in order to guarantee the vision and collective rights of these communities. (See more here.)

Inputs in the form of letters, conferences, publications, recommendations continue to be generated and express the particular interests and concerns of different sectors and regions of Colombia.  Victims’ groups, obviously, are particularly interested in ensuring that their rights are not slighted at the table.  On July 30, family members of victims of disappearance and kidnapping that form part of the NGO Fundación País Libre sent a letter to the government and FARC negotiators with some new inputs and a caution that if their needs are not met, they will not hesitate to seek remedies in international arenas.  (Read their letter here.) The victims called for a transitional justice process that guarantees victims’ rights and called on the parties to strengthen the institutional structures that provide human rights protections. . . .

 Church Goes to Havana, Explores Potential Role at the Peace Table

In early August, Msr. Luis Augusto Castro, the head of the Colombian Bishops’ Conference, announced that members of the church leadership would travel to Havana to assess the support that the Pope and the Vatican might provide to the peace process.  The upcoming visit of Pope Francisco to Cuba on September 19-22 on his way to the United States offers a potential opportunity for direct engagement with the parties at the peace table.  Pope Francis will be the third pope to visit Cuba and his trip is a primarily seen as a way to  recognize the improved U.S. – Cuba relationship–and the role that the Vatican and the pope played in the 18 months of secret negotiations that contributed to that improvement.  (See the phenomenal story by Peter Kornbluh and William LeoGrande here.)  Nonetheless, many Colombians are hoping that the Pope’s visit to Cuba will also offer an opportunity for the Pope to give support to the peace process.  In this regard, members of the Colombian church, lead by the head of the Colombian Bishops’ Conference  Msr. Augusto Castro, traveled to Havana in mid-August to meet with the parties and discuss whether it would be advantageous for the Pope to meet with the parties or to send a delegate to participate in the peace talks. (Read more here.) . . .

US: We’re winning the fight for diplomacy

DISARMAMENT & SECURITY .

A communication from Jo, Alejandro, Victoria, Matt, and the rest of the team at Moveon.Org

Republican leaders are admitting that they’re losing the fight over the diplomatic deal with Iran. Despite tens of millions spent by war hawks to sabotage the agreement, more and more Democrats are choosing diplomacy over war.

iran

They have the money. We have the people and the momentum.

We saw that yesterday, as thousands of MoveOn members and anti-war allies gathered outside more than 200 congressional offices and delivered petitions signed by hundreds of thousands of Americans. Members came together from MoveOn, Americans United for Change, Council for a Livable World, CREDO Action, DailyKos, Democracy for America, Friends Committee on National Legislation, National Iranian American Council, Peace Action, Win Without War, and more.

And this grassroots activism is leading to results: In the past 24 hours, Representatives Susan Davis, Bonnie Coleman Watson, and Ed Perlmutter have all come out for the deal. Representative Alan Lowenthal announced his decision to support the deal just in advance of the petition delivery, and he came out to announce it to MoveOn members in person.

We’re building something together, and the result—a diplomatic resolution to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon—will be historic.

Click here to see more images from yesterday’s national day of action

The fight isn’t over. When members of Congress return to Washington in just over a week, they’ll be deluged with propaganda by the war hawks who want to sabotage this deal.

We’ll keep up the pressure—and keep building the momentum for peace. We have just a few weeks to stop a war, but we know that we can do it together.

Thanks for all you do.

Question for this article:

Peace Agreement in South Sudan

DISARMAMENT & SECURITY .

An article by Tiffany Easthom, Country Director in South Sudan, Nonviolent Peaceforce

“This week [August 28], the final signature was placed onto the South Sudan peace agreement.  In doing so, all parties to the conflict have indicated their intentions to end the violent conflict that has rocked South Sudan for the past 21 months.  While the signing of the agreement is not a guarantee of peace, it is a public declaration of constructive, peaceful and positive intentions to end the war.

new sudan

 Having been on the front line of the conflict since the first day, the Nonviolent Peaceforce team is greatly relieved at the signing of the agreement and we want to extend our appreciation and support to the parties as they move into this new phase. We look forward to seeing strong, people centred leadership and action to move into the implementation of this agreement starting with an urgent and immediate cessation of hostilities.  Getting to peace is as complicated if not more so than getting to war.  The road ahead will be a long one that will take the dedication of all South Sudanese and the support of the international community to engage in reconciliation, justice and reconstruction.

 The people of South Sudan deserve real peace and the opportunity to build the country that was so long struggled for. The Nonviolent Peaceforce team is committed to supporting our South Sudanese brothers and sisters in working for peace.”

(Thank you to Janet Hudgins, the CPNN reporter for this article.)

Question for this article:

India: No More Hiroshima: No More Nagasaki: Peace Museum  

DISARMAMENT & SECURITY .

An article by Dr. Balkrishna  Kurvey, Indian Institute for Peace, Disarmament & Environmental Protection

On the eve of Hiroshima & Nagasaki Atomic bombing, Hiroshima Day was observed in the Raman Science Center, Nagpur. on 6th August 2015.  This is renowned Science Center of Government of India, Ministry of Culture. The theme was ” Environmental Impact of  Atomic Bomb Explosion”

Kurvey4

Selected High school Students from Nagpur were invited.
To catch them young, we are targeting youngsters who will be future citizens of the country to inculcate the idea of a Nuclear Weapon Free World.

Photographic exhibition  of Hiroshima & Nagasaki bombing was also displayed for the public from 6th to 9th August 2015 in the Raman Science Center.

Hiroshima Day was also arranged in Department of Environmental Science, Sardar Patel Mahavidyalaya (College), Chandrapur, India. This  prestigious teaching Institute of Central India  has more than 7200 students. Students of graduate, post-graduate, Ph.D. and some medical students attended the seminar. The theme was “Nuclear Weapons Disarmament and Environmental Protection  and Peace”  

I based my address on the study carried out by International Physicians for for Prevention of Nuclear war & Physicians For Social responsibility “Two Billion People  at Risk”, December 2013. 

In a  limited regional nuclear war between  India and Pakistan, if 150 Hiroshima type Bombs were used, what will be environmental consequences in Asia  in particular and world in General was the theme of the talk.

Unfortunately, there is mistrust, misunderstanding and animosity between India and Pakistan. Any fanatic military officer or political leader could start a nuclear war. Also due to misunderstanding or zealous military officials, nuclear war could be startes. 20 million people would be killed. Great cities of the sub-continent would be destroyed and much of South Asia would be blanketed with radioactive fallout. Climate experts show clearly that even this limited nuclear conflict would affect weather pattern throughout the world. Due to soot and debris injected in the atmosphere 74% of the sun light would be obstructed. Nuclear Winter would emerge. Ozone depletion would increase the incidence of cancer globally. Due to cold and darkness, crops could not be grown and because of non-availability of food grains,  1 billion people in global south would die of starvation and 1 billion others would suffer. Agriculture would be affected in the western hemisphere.

This would be the result of only a limited regional Nuclear War in South Asia. If the superpowers engage in nuclear war, it would be doomsday. Planet earth will suffer untold consequences and the human race would face extinction.

Public education and awareness is the key as there is no medicine. Prevention is the only way to safeguard the  human race.

Participants  and teachers asked many question, which were aptly answered.

Question for this article:

ICRC re Arms Trade Treaty: We must stop irresponsible arms trade or transfers

DISARMAMENT & SECURITY .

A declaration by the International Committee of the Red Cross

First Conference of the States Parties to the Arms Trade Treaty, Cancun, Mexico, 24-27 August 2015. Statement delivered by Peter Maurer, President of the ICRC, as a video address at the Conference.

icrc-english-french
ICRC Video

I am honored to be addressing you today on this historic occasion of the First Conference of the States Parties to the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), a treaty that promises to reduce the tremendous human suffering caused by the widespread and poorly regulated availability of conventional weapons.

The ATT establishes a global norm for responsible arms transfers. By requiring States Parties to consider respect for international humanitarian law and human rights law in their arms transfer decisions and to take measures to prevent the diversion of weapons, this Treaty will help to ensure that arms do not end up in the hands of those who would use them to commit war crimes, serious violations of human rights and other serious crimes.

In adopting the ATT, States have recognized that arms and ammunition can no longer be regarded as just another form of commercial goods. They have recognized that arms transfers require particular caution because of the devastating and irreparable harm that is caused when weapons fall into the wrong hands. And they have explicitly recognized that cooperation, transparency and information sharing underpin the responsible arms trade, and are critical to building confidence among States and therefore to the Treaty’s effectiveness.

The ATT’s aim to increase responsibility and transparency in the international trade in conventional arms will depend not only on the implementation of the Treaty’s requirements by States Parties, but also on the openness and transparency of the forums set up under the Treaty to review its implementation and operation, notably of the Conference of the States Parties. A strong level of transparency, notably in the initial and annual reports required under the Treaty, and in the review of the operation of the Treaty by the Conference of the States Parties will facilitate cooperation and build the confidence necessary for the Treaty’s success. The ICRC urges States Parties to keep this in mind in the decisions that they will take this week, notably on the rules of procedure and on the reporting mechanism.

(Article continued on the right column)

(Click here for a version of this article in French or here for a version in Spanish.)

Question for this article:

Do you think handguns should be banned?, Why or why not?

(Article continued from the left column)

The significance of the ATT, and the milestone that this First Conference of the States Parties represents, cannot be overstated. If we have reached this point today, it is thanks to all those who have worked tirelessly over the last decade and a half to make this Treaty a reality: the States that drove the process leading to the ATT’s adoption; the United Nations and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, which each drew attention to the high human costs of poorly controlled arms transfers; and, of course, the non-governmental organizations which first called for an arms trade treaty some fifteen years ago. In this respect, the crucial role played by the “Control Arms” coalition of NGOs in bringing about the ATT, and the invaluable expertise and assistance that they are now providing to universalization and implementation efforts, must be recognized.

The concerted efforts of States, international organizations, NGOs and the ICRC must be sustained and hopefully increased in the Treaty’s implementation phase, of which this First Conference of the States Parties is the starting point. Our work has only just begun. Not only must we strive to achieve the broadest possible adherence to the Treaty, notably by States involved in the arms trade, but also crucially we must ensure that the Treaty’s core obligations are faithfully implemented, notably through the establishment of robust national control systems.

In this regard, I remain concerned about the gap that subsists between the duty to ensure respect for international humanitarian law in arms transfers, and the actual transfer practices of too many States. The ICRC is directly confronted with this gap, in many countries where we witness the appalling consequences for civilians of the widespread availability and misuse of weapons, which facilitate violations of international humanitarian law, endanger vital medical and humanitarian assistance, provoke displacement and prolong armed conflicts. As weapons continue to flow, either through overt or covert transfers or through diversion, to some of the most brutal armed conflicts such as those seen in parts of the Middle East and of Africa today, there is an urgent need to close the gap between law and practice.

The true measure of success of the ATT is the extent to which this gap will be filled and the Treaty changes people’s lives in the years to come. If States were to join the Treaty but continue to transfer arms to belligerents with a record of committing war crimes or serious violations of human rights, this would severely undermine the ATT’s humanitarian purpose and its credibility.

CICR: Nous devons stopper le commerce et les transferts irresponsables d’armes

.DESARMAMENT & SECURITE.

Une déclaration par la Comité International ce la Croix-Rouge

Première Conférence des États parties au Traité sur le commerce des armes, Cancun, Mexique, 24-27 août 2015. Allocution vidéo prononcée par Peter Maurer, président du CICR, lors de la Conférence:

icrc-english-french
ICRC Video

Je suis honoré de prendre aujourd’hui la parole devant vous en ce moment historique, à l’occasion de la première Conférence des États parties au Traité sur le commerce des armes, un traité dont il y a tout lieu d’espérer qu’il réduira les terribles souffrances humaines causées par la disponibilité généralisée et insuffisamment réglementée des armes classiques.

Le Traité sur le commerce des armes établit une norme mondiale pour des transferts d’armes responsables. En obligeant les États parties à prendre en compte le respect du droit international humanitaire et du droit des droits de l’homme dans leurs décisions sur les transferts d’armes et à adopter des mesures visant à empêcher le détournement de ces armes, le Traité contribuera à ce que les armes ne se retrouvent pas dans les mains de ceux dont on peut attendre qu’ils les utilisent pour commettre des crimes de guerre, des violations graves des droits de l’homme et d’autres crimes graves.

En adoptant le Traité sur le commerce des armes, les États ont reconnu qu’il n’est plus guère possible de considérer les armes et les munitions comme une catégorie de marchandises comme les autres. Ils ont reconnu que les transferts d’armes exigent une prudence toute particulière en raison des dommages dévastateurs et irréparables que les armes provoquent lorsqu’elles tombent entre de mauvaises mains. Et ils ont explicitement reconnu que la coopération, la transparence et l’échange d’informations sous-tendent un commerce responsable des armes, et sont essentiels à l’instauration de la confiance entre les États et donc à l’efficacité du Traité.

La réalisation du Traité, dont le but est d’accroître la responsabilité et la transparence dans le commerce international des armes classiques, dépendra non seulement de la mise en œuvre des exigences du Traité par les États parties, mais aussi de l’ouverture et de la transparence des forums mis en place pour l’examen de sa mise en œuvre et de son fonctionnement, en particulier de la Conférence des États parties.

(Voir suite sur colonne de droite. . . )

(Cliquez ici pour la version anglaise de cet article ou ici pour la version espagnole.)

Question for this article:

Do you think handguns should be banned?, Why or why not?

(. . . suite)

Un niveau élevé de transparence, notamment dans les rapports initiaux et annuels requis au titre du Traité, et dans l’examen du fonctionnement du Traité par la Conférence des États parties, facilitera la coopération et instaurera la confiance nécessaire au succès du traité. Le CICR demande instamment aux États parties de garder cette idée à l’esprit lorsqu’ils prendront des décisions cette semaine, notamment concernant le règlement intérieur et le mécanisme d’établissement des rapports.

L’importance du Traité, et l’étape décisive que constitue cette première Conférence des États parties, ne sauraient être surestimées. Si nous sommes parvenus aujourd’hui à ce stade, c’est grâce à tous ceux qui ont œuvré sans relâche durant ces quinze dernières années pour que le Traité devienne réalité. Parmi eux, les États qui ont fait avancer le processus jusqu’au stade de l’adoption du Traité, l’Organisation des Nations Unies et le Mouvement international de la Croix-Rouge et du Croissant-Rouge, qui tous ont attiré l’attention sur le coût humain élevé des transferts d’armes insuffisamment contrôlés ; et, bien sûr, les organisations non gouvernementales qui furent les premières à réclamer un traité sur le commerce des armes il y a une quinzaine d’années. À cet égard, il faut reconnaître le rôle capital joué par la coalition des ONG « Control Arms » dans la réalisation du Traité, ainsi que l’expertise et l’assistance inestimables qu’elle apporte aujourd’hui aux efforts d’universalisation et de mise en œuvre.

Il convient de soutenir les efforts concertés accomplis par les États, les organisations internationales, les ONG et le CICR, qui, nous l’espérons, seront renforcés durant la phase de mise en œuvre du Traité, dont cette première Conférence des États parties est le point de départ. Notre travail ne fait que commencer. Nous devons à la fois nous efforcer de parvenir à l’adhésion la plus large possible du Traité, notamment par les États impliqués dans le commerce des armes, mais nous devons aussi impérativement veiller à ce que les obligations fondamentales du Traité soient fidèlement mises en œuvre, notamment par la mise en place de régimes de contrôle rigoureux au niveau national.

Sur ce point, je suis inquiet par l’écart qui existe entre le devoir d’assurer le respect du droit international humanitaire lors des transferts d’armes, et les pratiques effectives de transferts de trop nombreux États. Le CICR est directement confronté à cet écart dans nombre de pays où nous voyons les conséquences terribles de la disponibilité généralisée et l’utilisation abusive des armes, qui facilitent les violations du droit international humanitaire, entravent l’assistance médicale et humanitaire vitales, provoquent des déplacements et prolongent les conflits armés. Comme les armes continuent d’affluer, par le biais de transferts ouverts ou clandestins, ou par détournements, vers des conflits armés d’une très grande violence, tels que ceux que nous observons aujourd’hui dans certaines parties du Moyen-Orient et d’Afrique, il est urgent de combler l’écart entre le droit et la pratique.

C’est en voyant comment le Traité sur le commerce des armes comblera cet écart et changera la vie des populations dans les années à venir que l’on pourra véritablement mesurer son succès. Si les États adhérent au Traité, mais continuent de transférer des armes aux belligérants en commettant des crimes de guerre ou des violations graves des droits de l’homme, cela compromettra gravement l’objectif humanitaire du Traité sur le commerce des armes et sa crédibilité.