Category Archives: DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION

Toward a Culture of Peace Commission for Ashland, Oregon (USA)

.. DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION ..

by Eric Sirotkin, Ashland Culture of Peace Initiative

[Editor’s note: The following remarks were submitted on February 2 by Eric Sirotkin on behalf of the the Ashland Culture of Peace Initiative to the City Council Study Group on a City of Ashland Culture of Peace Commission.]

Ashland

Scene from Ashland proposal video

If you could have one chance to speak to the world’s most powerful political body, what would you say? When Václav Havel, the former political prisoner and then President Poet/playwright of the Czech Republic, got his invitation to speak to a joint session of the United States Congress he said that “the salvation of the this human world lies nowhere else than in the human heart, in the human power to reflect, in human meekness and in human responsibility.”

He told people preoccupied with getting reelected that they should “put morality ahead of politics, science, and economics” and that “the only genuine core of all our actions–if they are to be moral–is responsibility.”

Responsibility is “that fundamental point from which all identity grows” Thus, Havel declares, “I am responsible for the state of the world,” and he calls it a “responsibility not only to the world but also ‘for the world,’ as though I myself were to be judged for how the world turns out.”

A CULTURE OF PEACE

In 1999 the United States along with the International Community approved the adoption of the Declaration and Programme of Action on a Culture of Peace which defined the culture of peace as a goal much broader than the traditional idea of peace as the absence of war or violence. It called upon individuals and government to take actions to build and expand a culture of peace.

What is a culture of peace? In your discussions today you may want to share what it means to you. But also respect that it’s not the same for everyone and it’s not always easily translated. For us it has meant many things, but primarily it is a “way of life” that solves problems through dialogue and works to balance and expand respectful relations, even between people who disagree.

It is an idea whose time has come. Over 75 million people signed the Manifesto 2000, committing themselves to cultivate a culture of peace in daily life.

You don’t hear about these efforts in the traditional media.

But on the Transition to A Culture of Peace Blog website (http://decade-culture-of- peace.org/blog/), it mirrors the words of Vaclav Havel to Congress some decades before:

“…over the past few decades, the consciousness is growing that we must cultivate and create a culture of peace to replace the culture of war. If you believe, as I do, that the ultimate force in world history is the consciousness of people, then you can see why I believe that the world is on the verge of a great transformation. What is still lacking, however, is an institutional framework outside of the nation-state to make it possible.”

This is where we believe that you all play an essential and historic part.

(Continued into discussion)

ASHLAND CULTURE OF PEACE COMMISSION

(Continued from main article)

As a group of concerned citizens we have been engaged in a process that not only is intended to institute a Culture of Peace Commission in Ashland, but also has been meant to model it. We know we could go to the voters and get this approved, but as we told you in our packet we want to work with you and use our collective wisdom to come up with something that works for everyone.

In our individual meetings with you over the past month we have worked hard to resist charging forward, learning to apply the very principles inherent in the culture of peace to our own process. We’ve listened deeply and reflected individually and as a group, on your suggestions and your wise input gleaned from years of working within the City. It has convinced us that we all want the same thing.

COMMONALITY

Few disagree that we want to be embody a culture of peace. Adrienne Rich once said: “We all go to sleep dreaming of a common language.”

In many ways Ashland has key elements of a culture of peace:

Hundreds gathering each year for the International Day of Peace Feast for Peace;

Annual commemorations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that question aggression and strongly urge us to remember something greater;

Mediation school Programs that help children look at conflict differently; • Courses in Compassionate Listening, Restorative Justice Circles;

• Local programs produced like Immense Possibilities that help us to listen
and build a more connected community;

Since 1998 Ashland has been part of the Global Mayors for Peace 6,538 member cities in 160 countries & regions; http://www.mayorsforpeace.org/english/index.html

We are as Mayor Stromberg said in his State of the City address a city in the “quality of life business”…it’s in our” lifeblood. “ A community that institutionalizes a culture of peace becomes one that, in the Mayor’s words “attracts students and their

families regionally and nationally to this extraordinary and celebrated community.” We have listened to the important goals set out by the Mayor and all of you over the past months

A city that attracts young people

b) A city Council that in reality is working every day to build a peaceful culture;

c) The complications and limitations of the current commission process.
So we are more and more convinced from our discussions with you that we all want the same thing.

So what do we do?

We wish to hold off on a vote on any permanent Culture Peace Commission or in holding an election to implement it and follow some of your advice.

#1 – FORM AN INDEPENDENT ASHLAND CULTURE OF PEACE COMMISSION: This entity formulated outside of City Government would choose representatives from all sectors of the community – Like the Peace Wheel – Education Business Culture Science Environment Religion
Law Habitat

It would hopefully have a Liaison from the City Council and I understand that Pam Marsh has been willing to serve in such a capacity.

. …more.

Nigeria: Why we facilitated Abuja peace accord —Ben Obi

. . DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION . .

an article by Nigerian Tribune

The Special Adviser to the President on Inter Party Affairs, Senator Ben Obi, has stressed the need for political stakeholders at all levels to buy into the key ingredients of the peace accord, which was recently signed in Abuja, by presidential candidates and chairmen of registered political parties, including President Goodluck Jonathan of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and General Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

2041 Nigeria

Presidential candidates Muhammadu Buhari (left) and Goodluck Jonathan (right)

Speaking with newsmen in Abuja, Senator Obi whose office and that of National Security Adviser (NSA) created the platform and facilitated the epochal event, stressed that the Abuja ceremony was not meant to be an event in itself but the beginning of a wider nationwide process involving all political stakeholders, security institutions, civil society bodies and youth group across the country.

He stated that in developing the programme of the Peace Accord,they had in mind the implementation of a broad range of strategic objectives that would be co-owned by the major campaign organs of the leading political parties at the national, zonal, state, local government and ward levels.

The presidential adviser reiterated that key components of the peace accord included public sensitisation, youth education, peace building projects and community-wide awareness campaigns involving not just all the tiers of political campaigns but also traditional rulers, community and religious leaders.

He said some of the processes would involve workshops, seminars and town hall meetings on a continuous basis until the culture of peace and non-violent conducts during and after elections were inculcated into the Nigeria people, especially the youth.

He further charged that even though his office and that of the NSA took the lead in facilitating the Peace Accord, the responsibility now lies with the leaders and the people to own the agenda and drive it forward to its logical conclusion.

 

Latest Discussion

How should elections be organized in a true democracy?

Latest reader comment:

CPNN receives more and more articles from Africa about initiatives that contest the European model of “winner-takes-all” elections, and demand that elections should only be part of a broader democratic process that seeks consensus and compromise.

This fits with the pre-colonial systems of justice in Africa, when there was no monotheism and no single supreme god, no single supreme law, no single “truth” provided by divine intervention, but rather a compromise among many different “gods,” perspectives and “truths” arrived at through a process of mediation, for example, the “palabra.”

Here are some of the articles:

Ghana Youth Coalition wants politicians to commit to peace in 2012

Women’s World in Nationwide Sensitization [Sierra Leone]

Varsities vouch for peace ahead of general elections (Kenya)

Zimbabwe: Christian denominations launch peace initiative

Rethinking Post-Election Peacebuilding in Africa

Nigeria: Why we facilitated Abuja peace accord —Ben Obi

Dominican Republic: Attorney General, Justice & Transparency Foundation promote culture of peace

. DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION .

an article by El Periodico

In order to join efforts to strengthen the system of mediating conflicts and promoting a culture of dialogue in the country, the Attorney General and Justice and Transparency Foundation (FJT) will implement a series of actions for the prevention and resolution of conflicts at the family, school, work and community levels.

In this regard a joint cooperation agreement was signed by the Attorney General of the Republic Francisco Dominguez Brito and by FJT president Trajano Vidal Potentini Adames, and as a witness, the CEO of the National Conflict Resolution System of Public Prosecutions ((SINAREC), Angel Gomera.

Attorney General Dominguez Brito expressed his appreciation for the support and the willingness expressed by the Justice and Transparency Foundation to strengthen and expand the concept of reconciliation and conflict resolution as an alternative to the system of justice in cases of conflicts that can be resolved with understanding and respect for the dignity of each of the parties.

“This step contributes greatly to strengthening the justice of reconciliation in the Dominican Republic,” said the Head of Public Prosecutions.

For his part, Trajano Vidal Potentini highlighted the commitment of the authorities of the Attorney General to undertake what he called a new culture that established the Code of Criminal Procedure for the issue of reconciliation, which he described as essential for the development and harmony of the judicial system.

“We are very satisfied to be part of these efforts to establish a culture of peace, even more, of the community and in the neighborhoods to bring the good news that is developing in the direction of alternative dispute resolution,” said the FJT president.

As part of the commitment it was agreed to strengthen and disseminate community models that fit the needs, conditions and criteria for prospective or future centers of mediation, negotiation and conciliation in family, school, work and community order.

Also it was agreed to prepare and present a bill to support the application and development of alternative dispute resolution methods as a public policy to be implemented in the country.

The Public Ministry will ensure the presence of members of this institution trained in the application of the alternative methods of dispute resolution programs that are being developed by the foundation.

The agreement, which was signed at the headquarters of the Public Ministry in the Centro de los Héroes, will be effective for one year.

(Click here for a Spanish version of this article)

Question related to this article:

Rethinking Post-Election Peacebuilding in Africa

. DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION .

an article by Society for Peace Studies and Practice

The 9th International Conference and General Assembly of the Society for Peace Studies and Practice will take place from 9-13 August at the Igatius Ajuru University of Education in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Its theme will be “Rethinking Post-Election Peacebuilding in Africa.”

The call for papers provides the following analysis:

There are three phases: pre-election, election, and post-election . . . Where the first two phases are well handled, the post- election environment is peaceful but where they are poorly managed, the post-election environment is usually crisis-ridden. Given that not much work exists on post-election questions and their management in Africa, the Society for Peace Studies and Practice would like to commit it 2015 to addressing this critical issue, shedding more light on the nature, impact and management of post-election environment in Africa. Our particular interest is how to build peace after elections. . .

How do we restore healthy relationship between political actors after elections? What should be the role of winners and losers of elections? What should be the role of the judiciary, political parties, the media, electoral management bodies, private but prominent citizens in preventing post-election violence and other forms of political instability? What are the existing global best practices in post-election peace building? There will be special panels on post-election peacebuiling in Nigeria covering the 1999, 2001, 2003, 2007, 2011 and 2015 elections. . .

The conference program will consist of Commissioned Papers (Plenary Session) and Open Theme/Special Panels (Parallel Sessions). Potential participants are therefore invited to submit abstract proposals to the organizers.

In the event of the abstract being accepted, the deadline for submission of full draft paper will be 30th May 2015. Details are available at http://www.spsp.org.ng .

The Society for Peace Studies and Practice (SPSP) is a Not-for-Profit organisation that promotes non-violent approach to conflict resolution, through multi-level research, advocacy and actions that strengthen local capacities that will bring about a sustainable culture of peace.

The Society began as the brainstorm of a group of passionate advocates of the postgraduate programme of the Peace and Conflict Studies, Institute of African Studies, University of Ibadan, in 2003 seeking to prioritize conflict management as a professional practice and how to streamline the ethics that will guide scholars and practitioners in the field of peace building.

Initially spearheaded by staff and student members from the University of Ibadan led by Professor Isaac Olawale Albert; the Society was formally initiated and registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC/IT/NO.21194) as a Not-For-Profit Civil Society in 2004 and has gained national outlook and acceptance with its network of branches spread all-over Nigeria and beyond.

Question related to this article:

How should elections be organized in a true democracy?

CPNN receives more and more articles from Africa about initiatives that contest the European model of “winner-takes-all” elections, and demand that elections should only be part of a broader democratic process that seeks consensus and compromise.

This fits with the pre-colonial systems of justice in Africa, when there was no monotheism and no single supreme god, no single supreme law, no single “truth” provided by divine intervention, but rather a compromise among many different “gods,” perspectives and “truths” arrived at through a process of mediation, for example, the “palabra.”

Ghana Youth Coalition wants politicians to commit to peace in 2012

Women’s World in Nationwide Sensitization [Sierra Leone]

Varsities vouch for peace ahead of general elections (Kenya)

Zimbabwe: Christian denominations launch peace initiative

Rethinking Post-Election Peacebuilding in Africa